AI Rate Professor

Biology

Parisa Roghani

BIOL24 · BIO40 · BIOSC40 · BIOL2 · BIOLOGY2 · BIO2 · ANATOMY · BIOSC139 · BIOL104 · BIO7A · BIO40A · BIO20B · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you are a self-driven anatomy student and a chaotic classroom.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedTest-Only GradesTough GraderLecture HeavyUnpredictable Mood
  • Many students report , and grades based .
  • A minority praise her analogies, passion, and summer anatomy intensity when the course clicks.
  • Attendance and respect demands are high while and study guides are often lacking.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong students say tests dominate and .

In-person evidence is abundant and harsh; online sample is too small but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Anatomy volume, rapid lectures, and many.

Nearly ; online notes also call work hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and skipping is treated as a path to failing.

; online attendance notes are sparse but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

About a while .

Older positive summer reviews exist, but recent and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

, and little or makeup make grades feel unforgiving.

Format shift

Online BIOL24 and many in-person BIO40 reviews emphasize unfair or opaque scoring.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

from tests, but and study load remain heavy.

Format shift

Some terms pile notes and drawings; others complain there .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Scattered lectures, class walkouts, and humiliation stories outweigh the subset who love her analogies.

Format shift

; online sample is too thin to reverse the pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Students repeatedly say almost .

Format shift

Consistent across BIO40 and anatomy sections in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person anatomy and bio reviews are highly polarized: strong lecture skill for some, widespread frustration over organization, humiliation, and .

Main concern

Syllabus , and mood-driven class climate.

What students said

“She has changed the syllabus three times and we're only halfway through the semester because she has zero time management skills.”
ANATOMY
“ ”
BIO40
“she was so and made the subject interesting.”
BIO7A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Sparse online evidence is split between one glowing analogy comment and and test opinions.

Main concern

Tough, opinion-based grading with .

What students said

“Please avoid taking any class from her. , and grades them hard and unfairly.”
BIOL24
“A pleasure to listen to her analogies.”
BIO20B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

unclear targets and .

Test HeavyFew Graded AssignmentsNo Study Guides OftenLab ExamsSlow Score Return

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lab exams with slow return and little canvas use.

Test Only PointsScantron DelaysLab ExamsNo Canvas
“the only thing that was graded for .”
BIO40
“your grade is based off of your tests only. she and .”
BIOLOGY2

Online

One online review flags opinion-based test answers and .

Tough GraderOpinion-Based Test Answers
“ she's doing. She will put more then one correct answer, technically, but then you'll get it wrong because its not her OPINION.”
BIOL24

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a nice person, but a horrible teacher. She is very unorganized, it takes her at least 3 weeks to give us our scores back.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, mostly in-person anatomy and bio, contrasting harsh majority themes with a smaller praise cluster. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Unorganized and underprepared for class everyday.”

⚖️

24/100

“ rather than explain the more complex concepts”

🚨 Classroom Climate

20/100

“In front of the whole class she made me spit out my gum!!!”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“Learned a lot from her and gained a love for anatomy!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture ananlogies are amazing.
  • She spends 5 hours to go over the syllabus.
  • She continues lecture when in lab. No study guide!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you did as .
  • !!!
  • but curved, so most of us got an AB.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • There has been nothing graded or and it's past the .
  • she took forever to .
  • Has a tendency to schedule open labs on days everyone tells her no one can come

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews with long date span and recurring organization and some positive outliers.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 512

Course coverage

BIO210 reviews
BIO20B6 reviews
BIOL24 reviews
ANATOMY3 reviews
BIO403 reviews
Show 7 more courses
BIO40A2 reviews
BIOLOGY22 reviews
BIO7A1 review
BIOL1041 review
BIOL241 review
BIOSC1391 review
BIOSC401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 8

B range

8

B+ 1 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 1