AI Rate Professor

Biology

Nadia Fouladian-Tabris

BILO2 · BIOL2 · BIO2 · BIO20102 · X104406 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
48.57%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you can invest serious weekly hours and are fine self-teaching around uneven lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy Anatomy LoadExtra Credit LifelineMixed Lecture ClarityGroup Project HeavySelf-Study Required
  • , and constant studying.
  • and As, but teaching clarity and accent divide the class.
  • and many say you must teach yourself from slides and the book.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with daily study, study guides, and heavy , but the course is not an easy A.

Online and ; is the main grade cushion in both.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

, and dense lectures make intellectual load high.

Difficulty is consistently high across formats; online group logistics add friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and skipping is said to tank success.

; online also often marks attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; others call her the worst teacher and .

; online reviews range from awesome with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and and exams for students who grind.

Format shift

Both formats mention EC; , so policy may vary by term.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and constant memorization create an overwhelming weekly load.

Format shift

Online group projects and .

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Knowledge and cadaver exposure earn praise, but accent, pace, and .

Format shift

; online hybrid can feel clearer if students live in modules.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, quizzes, and exams rather than pure tests-only grading.

Format shift

Students explicitly prefer her .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and medical depth; others call lectures dry, whispered, or unusable and urge total avoidance.

Main concern

Time management in , and lectures many students stop listening to.

What students said

“Overall I think Prof Nadia is very smart, but she isnt a good teacher & has poor time management.”
BIOL2
“She gives a lot of chances for .”
BIOL2
“Youre better off teaching yourself.”
BIO2

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and hybrid students report heavy group work, lots of homework, and achievable As with effort, plus complaints about antiquated online design and .

Main concern

Group assignments and .

What students said

“If you put in the required work you will for sure get an A in this class, you determine the outcome.”
BIO2
“a LOT of . .”
BILO2
“it felt like she was a teacher who just stepped out of a portal from 1990”
BIOL2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and exams are hard but often tied to study guides and .

Weekly QuizzesStudy GuidesLab ExamsExtra CreditTimed Assessments

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lab practicals are demanding and often timed; study guides and quiz recycle help dedicated students.

Timed Lab ExamsWeekly QuizzesStudy GuidesMultiple Choice Tests
“in lab exam, she gives 100 questions, 4 questions in 2 minutes”
BIOL2
“Tests are mostly multiple choice, and .”
BIOL2

Online

Online comments stress tough grading, group projects, and .

Extra CreditGroup AssignmentsTest Heavy
“Dr. Fouladian will give you plenty of opportunities for .”
BIOL2
“You need to study A LOT.”
BIOL2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teach yourself. Professor Nadia is vsmart, but not a good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 anatomy reviews online and in person, balancing self-study critiques with extra-credit success stories. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“She is knowledgeable, but not a good teacher.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“ . Some of the .”

🅰️ Grade Path With Effort

55/100

“If you put in the required work you will for sure get an A in this class, you determine the outcome.”

👍

48/100

“Hard but not impossible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are copy and paste textbook might as well not attend lectures tbh.
  • , which helps in remembering it.
  • Could barely understand her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Anatomy is a lot of memorization! It is a 5 unit course so it is a lot of work.
  • Lots of
  • Be prepared for heavy lectures and .

Theme 3

🧪

  • , and models in class were awesome
  • The labs are usually a total mess, but .
  • Much hands on work (dissection/cadavers/models) was a great honor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews with rich detail and a stable split between grind-and-succeed versus self-teach-and-avoid give a reliable polarized picture.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

BIO219 reviews
BIOL211 reviews
BILO24 reviews
BIO201021 review
X1044061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2