AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Muwafaqu Al-Asad

INTEGBIX103 · MEDAS201B · 102A · MEDAS201D · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Strong pick for medical assisting if you show up, do the work, and if and ultra-clear lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring clinical mentorWell organized labsHeavy homework loadApproachable and humbleSplit student opinions
  • Most MEDAS students praise his clinical experience, care, and .
  • Two strongly , and unresponsive.
  • ; effort and textbook prep help unlock As.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn As with prep and effort, plus some , but tough grading and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is moderately paced clinical material; difficulty ratings cluster mid-range with some hard outliers.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory for MEDAS sections.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

About three-quarters would take him again, driven by caring clinical mentoring despite two harsh outlier reviews.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Several students call him fair with clear criteria and , while .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Tags and comments repeatedly mention lots of homework and dense material in a short span.

Format shift

All workload comments come from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and care; a minority report disorganization and unresponsiveness.

Format shift

All teaching comments come from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of homework, group projects, skills labs, and .

Format shift

All assessment comments come from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person MEDAS students largely find him caring, experienced, and fair, while a , and .

Main concern

Inconsistent organization and occasional tough grading can frustrate students who need structure.

What students said

“ . for MEDAS A,B,C. Recommended. and he knows if you are trying.”
MEDAS201B
“Go to his class, read the book before come to class and you will get A”
102A
“one of the learn from. He was at the same time overbearing and confusing.”
INTEGBIX103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and fair testing more than strict proctoring details.

Skills lab focusHomework heavyExtra credit available

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments , and course exams with occasional .

Skills labHomeworkExtra credit
“He is fair in grading. The . .”
MEDAS201B
“Very fair, wants you to learn and pass the course.”
MEDAS201B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . for MEDAS A,B,C. Recommended. and he knows if you are trying. he is a helpful and . cares about the student.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews spanning 2017-2023, balancing majority clinical praise with two harsh critiques. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️

74/100

“Hes passionate about teaching and .”

📈 Effort Unlocks the A

68/100

“Go to his class, read the book before come to class and you will get A”

⚠️ Polarizing Outliers

30/100

“ and does not care about his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he has a lot of experience in the clinical site
  • VERY APPROACHABLE! TY Dr. AL!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He is fair in grading
  • a lot of hw and sometimes didnt tell the class if its individual or group work
  • Very fair, wants you to learn and pass the course

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • cares about the student
  • Dr. Al is very humble soul

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews from 2017-2023 show mostly consistent praise with two detailed negative outliers.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MEDAS201B5 reviews
102A1 review
INTEGBIX1031 review
MEDAS201D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values