AI Rate Professor

English

Neal Skapura

ONLINEENG1A · ENG00543312 · ENG005 · ENG1 · ENGL1A · ENG5A · ENG5 · ENGL5 · ENGL2369 · ENG4665 · ENGA · ENG101 · ENGL2344 · ENGLISH · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Only take him if you want a rigorous critical-thinking grind and ; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy ReadingPolarizingSlow Or Late GradingCritical Thinking Focus
  • some praise deep critical thinking .
  • Expect and fallacies, and high difficulty especially online.
  • and and formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

, and many low or uncertain grades show an A takes real sustained effort.

Online and ; online adds timed fallacy quizzes and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and critical analysis repeatedly described as confusing and hard.

Difficulty is high in both formats, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections list attendance mandatory, others optional or not stated, with .

Online ; many older in-person reviews omit attendance detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Roughly half the sentiment is strongly positive for .

Both formats are polarized; take-again rate near 43% matches the split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

format and harsh essay criticism.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework, weekly postings, multi-page essays, and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress weekly modules and fallacy quizzes; and writing volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Some find him insightful and accessible; many find him vague, unresponsive, insulting, or confusing.

Format shift

Recent online praise for access coexists with .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Course mixes essays and discussion posts with fallacy quizzes and finals that can dominate stress.

Format shift

Online often highlights timed quizzes and an ; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some learn a lot from film and fallacy work, many call him harsh, vague, insulting, or unhelpful.

Main concern

, and poor support push many students away.

What students said

“ !!”
ENG1
“ .”
ENG005
“this class was the hardest online class .”
ENG5
“I love his Critical Thinking class. I actually learned a lot”
ENG5

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections mix accessible caring support with , and at least one report of a .

Main concern

, and uneven communication can tank the experience.

What students said

“When I was stuck, he would respond within 24 hours and would call or zoom with students.”
ENG5
“He does not grade anything till the last day of finals.”
ENG5
“the quizes are from 7-11pm which is way dif than any online class & 4 some reason the .”
ENG5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments center on tough fallacy quizzes and essays; friendliness is low but .

Fallacy QuizzesTimed Evening QuizzesEssaysIn-Person Final ReportedTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and harsh critique more than proctoring tools.

Fallacy Term TestsEssaysFilm AnalysisTough Grading
“The hardest parts were the .”
ENGL5
“ so ever. Not helpful!!”
ENG5

Online

Online evidence includes timed evening quizzes and .

Timed Quizzes 7-11pmFallacy QuizzesOn-Campus Final ReportedLate Bulk Grading
“also the quizes are from 7-11pm which is way dif than any online class & 4 some reason the .”
ENG5
“He does not grade anything till the last day of finals.”
ENG5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews (5 online, 25 in person), highlighting polarized critical-thinking rigor versus support gaps. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

25/100

“He's a nice guy, but I won't be retaking his class online and I don't suggest anyone else do either.”

🧠 High Intellectual Challenge

28/100

“this class was the hardest online class .”

💬 Polarizing Teaching

40/100

“I love his Critical Thinking class. I actually learned a lot which is surprising for a community college class.”

⏱️

30/100

“He does not grade anything till the last day of finals.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Skapura knows what he's doing.
  • .
  • He insults ur writing if if ur trying.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the
  • if I had all the time in the world.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Character

  • When I was stuck, he would respond within 24 hours and would call or zoom with students.
  • This teacher would send me weird emojis and was very flirty
  • didn't e-mail you in a timely matter.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty reviews over many years with and polarizing themes give strong, if mixed, signal.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG511 reviews
ENGL53 reviews
ENG0052 reviews
ENG12 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ONLINEENG1A2 reviews
ENG005433121 review
ENG1011 review
ENG46651 review
ENG5A1 review
ENGA1 review
ENGL23441 review
ENGL23691 review
ENGLISH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2