AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Yasmin Fathi

CHEM30A · CHEM1B · CHEM1A · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will attend, use tutoring when needed, and want a caring chem teacher who still expects real effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleDisorganized lecturesHard examsExtra credit availableSkip class and fail
  • Most students find her caring and .
  • and exams often feel harder or less aligned with lecture.
  • and partial credit help grades if you attend and put in steady work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Many students earn A or A- with and partial credit, but and heavy content still require real study time.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Chemistry content is dense and lecture-heavy, so beginners need tutoring and consistent practice .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and students say skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Most students would take her again for her care and accessibility, though a and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Partial credit, , and several A grades point to relatively forgiving scoring when work is completed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

Students report lots of homework and a large amount of content to absorb, so the load is steady rather than light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many call her caring and , but several also say lectures and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise her care and accessibility but , and .

Main concern

and labs may offer limited help.

What students said

“She would always answer my questions and .”
CHEM30A
“ and .”
CHEM1B
“ ”
CHEM30A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard and sometimes poorly aligned with lecture, though partial credit softens the blow.

Hard examsPartial creditQuiz-based checksLecture alignment issues

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

questions students say were not taught, but partial credit appears.

Hard examsPartial creditLecture mismatch risk
“the ”
CHEM1B
“ and she puts questions on the .”
CHEM30A
“She doesn't try to trick you in the ”
CHEM30A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She genuinely cares about you succeeding the class and will go in reasonable pace for everyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 , and effort-for-reward themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“She genuinely cares about you succeeding the class & will go in reasonable pace for everyone.”

📚 Lecture Organization Risk

45/100

“ and .”

🎯 Helps Grades

72/100

“She does provide opportunities as .”

👍

73/100

“Totally would take her again if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She made chemistry fun and easy.
  • and she often responded to questions in a condescending tone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and she puts questions on the .
  • makes the class somewhat easy without letting us loose out on learning the content.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I just love her! Not only is she understanding, she genuinely want all of her students to succeed.
  • .
  • Prof Fathi is good not great.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven fairly detailed in-person reviews from 2018-2020 show a consistent mix of praise and critique, though the sample is moderate and somewhat dated.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM30A9 reviews
CHEM1A1 review
CHEM1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values