AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Frances Moy

SAS00 · COUN24 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Great first-year counselor class if , and low academic pressure.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring counselorFirst-year guideAccessible outside classEncouragingLow stress
  • Students credit her with turning rough first-year starts into strong GPAs through hands-on guidance.
  • Counseling classes stay light, interactive, and textbook-free with journals, group work, and guest talks.
  • All four reviews are five-star and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Low difficulty ratings and ; grades appear easy when students engage with light activities.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

Counseling content centers on self-reflection, journals, and group work rather than dense theory.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

42/100

At ; others do not contradict a structured class presence.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and praises her kindness, guidance, and encouragement.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

; and activities are described as helpful rather than punitive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

84/100

No textbooks; workload is journals, catalog activities, guest talks, and group work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Bright, kind, caring lectures with strong out-of-class accessibility for first-year students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on journals, group activities, and class participation rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and confidence-building with helpful class activities.

Main concern

Very small sample and .

What students said

“she effectively guided me through and helped me reach new inspiration to turn my first semester around into a 4.0GPA!”
SAS00
“The teacher is really nice and caring. .”
COUN24
“The catalog activity and and fun.”
COUN24

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize light in-class activities and reflection work with no mention of strict proctored exams.

Journal assignmentsGroup activitiesGuest presentationsNo textbook

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections rely on journals, group work, and .

Journal assignmentsGroup workGuest presentations
“The catalog activity and and fun.”
COUN24
“I really enjoyed the guest presentation and the group work we did in class.”
COUN24

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I really couldn't be grateful enough to Frances and her guidance in my first year of school... helped me reach new inspiration to turn my first semester around into a 4.0GPA!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person counseling reviews, highlighting supportiveness and light activities. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“The teacher is very bright and kind.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

❤️ About Character

90/100

“The teacher is really nice and caring.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • The catalog activity and and fun.
  • I also liked how we learned more about ourselves.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She always has high expectation for us.
  • The teacher is really nice and encourage us to keep trying hard.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only four highly positive in-person reviews from 2019; consistent tone but limited sample and sparse grade detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUN243 reviews
SAS001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1