AI Rate Professor

English

Chriss Foster

ENG01A · ENGL1B · ENG1A · PSYCH1A · RHET110 · ENG5 · ENGLISH1A · ENGL201 · 1A · ENG201 · ENG1B · ENGLISH1B · ENGLI1A · PHYC1 · ENG1AAND1B · ENG1A1BENG5 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a rigorous writing challenge; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy papersHigh expectationsUnclear online helpPolarizing
  • In-person students split between transformative writing growth and overload
  • Online sections are widely warned against for vague help and
  • Expect , and little late-work flexibility

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say she is not an easy A and , and high standards.

; online adds that makes the A even harder.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content and , and often graduate-style capstone work.

Online and and writing volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and expect consistent presence for a writing-heavy course.

; online focuses more on deadlines than seat time.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

Recommendation rate is low overall, with and mixed praise only for motivated writers.

Online reviews are mostly Avoid; and Avoid for easy-A seekers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and comments about high expectations and little late-work mercy dominate.

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats, with online students .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students report so , and stacked deadlines.

Format shift

Paper load is heavy online and in person; online also cites weekly books and no late work.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students call her brilliant and transformative, while many call her unhelpful, late, or disengaged online.

Format shift

; online teaching experience is largely poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment centers on numerous papers, research projects, and a .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and capstone-style writing over traditional tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

serious writers praise skill growth, while , and lateness.

Main concern

and writing load plus uneven clarity and occasional lateness or favoritism claims.

What students said

“Dr. Foster is one of the best. Her teaching style is preparing a student to be able to write effectively at the University level”
ENG1AAND1B
“Final assignment is impossibly loaded, needed 17 pages with apa format.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report confusing instructions, poor communication, delayed grades, and .

Main concern

Vague directions, unhelpful replies, and term.

What students said

“ . She is the most unhelpful professor I have ever had.”
ENG5
“ ! Communication with her is extremely frustrating.”
ENGL1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk comes mainly from massive papers and capstones rather than proctored exams.

Heavy final papersCapstone essayAPA research paperFew traditional exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and stacked writing assignments more than exams.

APA research paperMany long essays17-page final
“Final assignment is impossibly loaded, needed 17 pages with apa format.”
ENG1A

Online

Online comments focus on graduate-level capstone essays and .

Capstone essayLate paper gradingMany papers
“Even just for a second year English class, we had to write a Capstone for the final.”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Communication with her is extremely frustrating.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, separating strong . Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

18/100

“You have to write so many papers and shes a .”

🖥️ Online Warning

25/100

“ !!!!!”

✍️ Serious Writer Upside

70/100

“if you need to challenge you're self and want to be more than a mediocre writer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a wonderful teacher with great personality and high professional skills!
  • She doesn't clarify anything and .
  • she would show up late to class each morning by at least 10 minutes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're looking for an easy A, this isnt the professor for you
  • It feels as if you're writing for grad school and not undergraduate.
  • she is fair and you can do well if you do decent work.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • .
  • she refuses to grade all of your work until the end of the semester
  • Communication with her is extremely frustrating.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-two reviews spanning many years show a and harsh online experiences.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 59
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENG57 reviews
ENG1B5 reviews
ENGL1B3 reviews
PSYCH1A3 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENG01A2 reviews
ENG1AAND1B2 reviews
ENGLISH1B2 reviews
1A1 review
ENG1A1BENG51 review
ENG2011 review
ENGL2011 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
PHYC11 review
RHET1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2