AI Rate Professor

Art History

Kim Thoman

ART20 · ART23 · ART1 · ART202124A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a kind, passionate teacher who helps you grow and makes learning enjoyable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate Art MentorExtremely HelpfulKind and FlexiblePortfolio-Based FinalsSupportive Feedback
  • All six reviews give a perfect 5/5 quality score with strong praise for passion and care.
  • She checks on students who fall behind and pushes them as far as they want to go.
  • Midterms and than traditional exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Supportive grading and effort rather than high-stakes tests.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings average about 2.2 and students describe enjoyable drawing work rather than abstract overload.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though the tone is flexible and student-centered.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every review is enthusiastically positive and several students stayed multiple semesters.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Students feel encouraged and supported rather than harshly judged on creative work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

Studio practice and demos dominate; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Consistently praised as passionate, knowledgeable, demo-heavy, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades center on studio work with midterms and finals as portfolio reviews.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Students describe an exceptionally supportive in-person studio experience with , and portfolio-style assessments.

Main concern

Older reviews with .

What students said

“if you are looking for a and flexible, Thoman is the teacher for you!”
ART1
“Super nice and checks up on you if you fall behind. Helps you back up.”
ART20
“ and for the semester.”
ART202124A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are portfolio reviews of semester work rather than closed-book tests.

Portfolio ReviewNo Traditional ExamStudio Work Showcase

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Midterms and during the semester.

Portfolio ReviewSemester Work Review
“ and for the semester.”
ART202124A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you are looking for a and flexible, Thoman is the teacher for you!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching passion, support, and portfolio assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ ! She teaches with a passion and made it exciting for me to learn how to draw.”

❤️ Student Support

95/100

“Super nice and checks up on you if you fall behind. Helps you back up.”

📚 Assessment Style

88/100

“ and for the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches with a passion and made it exciting for me to learn how to draw.
  • so much knowledge!
  • as far as you want to go because she is so passionate about her skill.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She's an angel. So sweet and she knows what she's talking about.
  • kind and flexible
  • Ms. Thoman is a very lovely teacher.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and for the semester.
  • I took her class just for fun, and I absolutely loved it!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but all are older (2006-2012) and lack grade or attendance specifics.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART203 reviews
ART11 review
ART202124A1 review
ART231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values