AI Rate Professor

Art History

Robert Horning

ART1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

; the material is easy but teaching and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProIncomprehensible lecturesIrrelevant anecdotesForgets graded papersPretentiousObscures simple material
  • Material itself is not hard, but lectures make simple ideas .
  • Instructor often seems incomprehensible and off-topic.
  • Students report unrecorded graded papers and poor organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Content is not hard, but poor organization and missing grade records still create friction for a clean A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students say the material itself was not hard to understand; the barrier was the instructor.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The sole review calls him a pretentious, incompetent excuse for a teacher.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Forgetting to record graded papers undermines trust in .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not described as heavy; complaints center on lecture quality, not volume.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Lectures obscure simple material with irrelevant anecdotes and are often incomprehensible.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments highlight graded papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review paints lectures as , and .

Main concern

Incomprehensible delivery and forgotten graded work.

What students said

“this man was often incomprehensible. He also .”
ART1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“a pretentious, incompetent excuse for a teach”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting lecture clarity and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“When he wasn't telling irrelevant anecdotes, he gave lectures that obscured otherwise simple information.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“this man was often incomprehensible.”

📋

28/100

“He also .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gave lectures that obscured otherwise simple information
  • this man was often incomprehensible
  • irrelevant anecdotes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The material was not hard to understand, but the instructor was!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old review from 2011 with no grade or , so confidence is limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values