AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Martha Akrop

NUTRI10 · NUTR10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

if you have another option; students report and harsh payoff for heavy effort.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing online designUseless study guidesProctored examsNo directionHard work for B
  • Students strongly warn against her Nutrition 10 offering, especially online-style delivery.
  • Study and provide little real help.
  • Hard work still may yield only a high B; no or late work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report grinding for an 89.9 B with hard work and no leniency on late work or .

Evidence comes only from in-person-tagged reviews that discuss online-style course delivery.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about hard, mismatched tests make content feel tougher than expected.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

; frustration focuses on structure and exams instead.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Every review and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

No or late work, and hard work can still leave students just below an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Long useless study guides, forums, worksheets, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she gives no direction and the class is a mess with outdated materials.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Worksheets and forums are easy, but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All five reviews are tagged in person but describe a messy, poorly supported Nutrition 10 experience with mismatched tests and heavy effort for middling grades.

Main concern

, and tests that do not match prep materials.

What students said

“ . I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY SHE IS STILL TEACHING.”
NUTR10
“SHE GIVES YOU NO DIRECTION AND STUDY GUIDE DOESN'T GIVE YOU ANY HELP EITHER.”
NUTRI10
“the study guides were absolutely USELESS (21+ pages of garbage for a )”
NUTR10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and at least one review mentions inconvenient proctored exams.

Proctored examsStudy guides mismatch testsHard exam questions

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students describe hard tests that do not match study guides, with at least one mention of proctored exams.

Proctored examsMismatched study guidesHard tests
“Especially since the and a big inconvenience.”
NUTR10
“the study guides have Nothing to do with whats on the Tests.”
NUTR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY SHE IS STILL TEACHING.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting direction, exams, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“SHE GIVES YOU NO DIRECTION AND STUDY GUIDE DOESN'T GIVE YOU ANY HELP EITHER.”

🚫 Recommendation

10/100

“IF .”

📝

28/100

“the study guides have Nothing to do with whats on the Tests.”

⚖️ Grade Payoff

28/100

“YOU WILL GET AN 89.9% B WITH HARD, HARD WORK.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gives you no direction
  • This class was a mess
  • Half of the course seemed to be based on the previous edition of the textbook

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • HARD, HARD WORK
  • and a big inconvenience
  • no e.c. or late work allowed

Theme 3

📚 About Materials

  • study guides were absolutely USELESS
  • study guides have Nothing to do with whats on the Tests
  • STUDY GUIDE DOESN'T GIVE YOU ANY HELP

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistently negative reviews from 2010-2011 give a , but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NUTR103 reviews
NUTRI102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values