AI Rate Professor

English

Janette Larson

ENG100ENG201 · ENGLISH101 · ENGL201 · ENG201 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100 · 49 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
18.92%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already write at a high level and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear InstructionsHarsh FeedbackHeavy Writing LoadContradictory Expectations
  • Most students call her a .
  • Instructions and rubrics are often unclear or incomplete until after work is graded.
  • Recent online ENG100 reviews are overwhelmingly negative; a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students still earn As, but many report zeros for tiny mistakes, vague rubrics, and heavy effort for a fair grade.

Online reviews stress unfair zeros; and few graded items.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content is standard English, but and heavy writing make it feel much harder than it should.

; online adds communication and AI-check stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews mark attendance mandatory with participation mattering and penalties for missing class.

In-person stresses participation and calling out late students; but often required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most recent comments .

Online evidence is almost uniformly avoid; a minority of .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students report zeros for small mistakes and grades that feel personal or picky.

Format shift

Online zeros and AI-related Fs appear often; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many papers, journals, discussion boards, and rewrites create a heavy writing .

Format shift

Online reports lots of homework and so many papers; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Average quality is low; unclear instructions, rude interactions, and .

Format shift

Online experience is worse; a few older in-person students found her engaging and funny.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and group projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers; but comments focus on writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and light paper counts, many call her picky, rude, or .

Main concern

tank the grade.

What students said

“If you want to get an A .”
ENG201
“There are 4 papers and she's a very tough/picky grader, it's like she refuses to give an A.”
ENG201
“ and and often contradicts students work and assignments.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG100/201 reviews are largely hostile: zeros for small mistakes, poor communication, AI checks, and vague instructions.

Main concern

Harsh zeros, ignored emails, and contradictory or over-worded instructions.

What students said

“ unless you wanna be constantly frustrated! She gives poor instruction and contradicts what she says!”
ENG100
“ ... Your assignment can easily be lowered to such an unfair grade if you don't follow the directions correctly.”
ENG100
“She doesn't communicate well, she gave me a zero for one mistake on a 25 point assignment”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and ; exam format is not clearly detailed in most reviews.

Paper HeavyResearch PaperFew Graded ItemsAI Detection Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and group projects; finals are research papers more than timed exams.

Research PaperGroup ProjectFew Papers
“The final, which was an 8-10 page research paper was easy to complete because she helped us all with time management”
ENG201
“There are 4 papers and she's a ”
ENGL201

Online

, and AI checks rather than proctored exams.

Writing AssignmentsAI DetectionHarsh Zeros
“She check your work for ai so just so you know n give you a an F.”
ENG100
“Gave lots of zeros and .”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you wanna be constantly frustrated! She gives poor instruction and contradicts what she says!”

Voice snapshots generated from 49 reviews across online and and clarity themes. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️

22/100

“Every time she doesn't like the slightest thing about an assignment, she slaps a 0 and moves on.”

📉 Recommendation Risk

22/100

“ ... 100% go with another professor.”

📝

30/100

“ .”

💬 Communication Issues

28/100

“I've tried asking her to talk, but she ignores emails/confrontation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does not seem organized or .
  • and very rude
  • She is unable to make creative criticism, instead making basic level comments

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want to get an A .
  • The A impossible.
  • She grades you based on how much she likes you.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very rude and disrespectful towards my work
  • gets easily frustrated and stressed when students aren't paying attention
  • Larson was easily the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

49

Recent reviews read by the AI

49

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

49 detailed reviews spanning many years, with and strong recent online agreement.

Inside 49 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG10019 reviews
ENG20118 reviews
ENG100ENG2014 reviews
ENGL2013 reviews
1002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH1002 reviews
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 1 · A 12 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 6 · B- 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2