AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Heydar Zahedani

MATH125 · MATH103 · MAT150 · MATH115 · MATH30 · MATH155 · CALC1 · CALC2 · MATH226 · MATH150 · MATH265 · MATH126 · MATH260 · 68 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Strong pick for an understandable, high-support math class with lots of if you can handle his accent and show up for practice reviews.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEXTRA CREDITAmazing lecturesPractice exams match testsDrop lowest scoresStudent-friendly notes card
  • Students repeatedly say and makes high grades very attainable.
  • He is often called the calc and DE.
  • A minority report accent issues, harsh tone, or , so experiences are not universal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

, dropped lowest scores, notecards, and reachable with steady effort.

; online is similar when lectures and feedback actually happen.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

He simplifies hard topics step by step so calc and DE feel manageable even for students who previously hated math.

Both formats praise clarity, though a .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but practice reviews and lecture notes make showing up the easy path to an A.

In-person students stress going to class for matching practice material; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Roughly seven in ten would take him again, with many calling him the complaints.

In-person recommendation is stronger and more consistent; online includes both glowing and absent-lecture reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Tons of , and partial credit create a very student-friendly grade buffer.

Format shift

Generosity is documented heavily in person and also in successful online sections.

Workload

Light

68/100

, and success depends more on practice exams and class problems than endless busywork.

Format shift

Most in-person DE/calc comments call work manageable; a few courses still mention lots of .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and care for student success dominate the large review set.

Format shift

In-person teaching is the strength; online quality depends on whether he actually delivers lectures and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Grades center on a few exams and , while .

Format shift

Both formats describe test/quiz heavy grading with practice materials that preview the real exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In person he is widely praised for , and abundant that make As realistic.

Main concern

Accent and occasional reports of a condescending tone bother some students.

What students said

“very easy to get an A, just show up to lectures and do the problems along.”
MATH265
“ and go over with in class... you're allowed to use one page of .”
MATH265
“Disrespectful, condescending & rude to students.”
MATH125

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise clarity and , while a few say lectures were missing or communication lagged.

Main concern

A few students report no live lectures or slow grade posting online.

What students said

“ , and his lectures are really easy to understand.”
MATH260
“This professor never showed up for any of the lectures leaving many students doing their own work.”
MAT150
“No surprise problems, he is very clear with how he runs his class.”
CALC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams closely follow practice materials, often allow a notecard, and include with lowest scores dropped.

Practice exams match testsOne-page notecardDrop lowest exam/quizExtra credit problemsNo surprise questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams mirror practice quizzes/tests, often allow one page of notes, and include plus drops.

Practice exams match testsNotecard allowedExtra creditDrop lowest quiz and test
“you're allowed to use one page of .”
MATH265
“Always an problem on each, and you get a notecard for .”
MATH265
“the , and the questions are based off the .”
CALC1

Online

Online students report no-surprise tests aligned with class content when the section is well run, but .

Tests match lecturesExtra creditDrop lowest
“ ”
MATH260
“No surprise problems, he is very clear with how he runs his class.”
CALC1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Goated math professor, one of the ... very easy to get an A, just show up to lectures and do the problems along.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (7 online, 43 in and a minority of tone/online issues. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He is the , and he is helping the students a lot.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

86/100

“gives lots of , and tests and . definitely recommend taking this professor”

⚠️ Accent & Tone Risk

35/100

“Disrespectful, condescending & rude to students. Needs to work more on teaching students instead of insulting them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • and makes math easy
  • and step-by-step.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very easy to get an A, just show up to lectures

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • lowkey charming and handsome
  • accent can be tough
  • Disrespectful, condescending & rude to students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

68

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with consistent praise for practice exams and , though vote-botting and some recent hostility claims add noise.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 510
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH26510 reviews
MAT1505 reviews
MATH1505 reviews
MATH1555 reviews
CALC14 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH2604 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
MATH2263 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATH1262 reviews
MATH302 reviews
1552601 review
29411 review
CALC21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

28

A+ 14 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 4 · B 1 · B- 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1