AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shannon Myers

MTH150 · CALC150 · MTH226 · MATH64 · MATH103 · MATH155 · MATH126130 · MATH226 · MATH150 · MATH126 · MATH260 · MATH270 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
58.06%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take her if and ; avoid if you need crystal-clear live lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyExtra credit generousPartial creditSelf-study online videosPractice exams match
  • , but partial credit and often save the A.
  • Online success depends on self-teaching from videos, Cengage, and study guides.
  • Personality is widely liked even when lecture clarity is mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

, and practice exams that mirror tests make an A realistic for organized students.

Online students often call it an easy A with study guides; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Calc and discrete content still demand real .

Both formats report moderate difficulty around three with test-heavy pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

; in-person sections sometimes require presence or participation.

Online evidence leans optional; and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; fans praise fairness while critics reject lecture quality.

Recommendation is split similarly online and in person, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students repeatedly cite partial credit hunting, , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Homework and long videos can eat hours, but grade weight .

Format shift

Online Cengage quizzes can run very long; but not always overwhelming.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Warm and funny personality, but lecture depth and organization are inconsistent.

Format shift

Online videos draw more complaints; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Many reviews say nearly all the , and a final.

Format shift

and in-person calc sequences.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students often love her humor and , though flipped formats and uneven lectures frustrate some.

Main concern

Flipped video prep plus tough finals can feel mismatched to study guides.

What students said

“Shes sarcastic, funny, and very FAIR. She's a ”
MATH155
“the and she doesn't help you understand them in class”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online math is heavily self-paced with , and exam-focused grades; results split between easy A with study guides and .

Main concern

Lecture videos can be shallow or late, so weaker self-learners struggle.

What students said

“If you know how to use online material to your advantage it should be an easy A.”
math260
“She has fill-in-the-blank stuff that is long and boring, and by the time you get done filling in the blanks, ”
MATH270

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are the main grade driver, often close to provided .

Practice exams similar to real testsPartial creditExtra creditTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but prior exams, evil-plan partial credit, and reduce risk.

Study prior testsPartial creditExtra credit on exams
“ and should be gucci!”
270
“She gives an opportunity for 10%.”
MATH270

Online

; practice or past exams often match, with little mention of proctoring tools.

Practice exams matchTest heavyExtra credit notes
“She provides the as the exams you get during the course.”
MATH270
“ . theyre pretty much identical aside from changing numbers.”
MATH155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE !!! Prof Myers made calc 3 a very fun and enjoyable class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (25 online, 25 in person), balancing exam-heavy grading with lecture quality splits. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

76/100

“She's a little longer to do it but she wants you to succeed”

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“her lecture videos are a bland textbook definition and apply it format”

🧪

82/100

“ as 98% of your grade is based on the exams and quizzes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes sarcastic, funny, and very FAIR
  • If you dislike online learning, run
  • her lectures are videos prerecorded from 2019 summer

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you do the work, its such an easy grade
  • Don't bother using the practice exams as a reference
  • ALWAYS HAVE AN EVIL PLAN

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • This class was pretty much taught by Cengage
  • Work is entirely on you, Youtube videos as lecture
  • her online format was easy to understand

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews balanced 25 online and 25 in person across many years give strong multi-format evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 58
3 out of 511
2 out of 513
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH15010 reviews
MATH15510 reviews
math2607 reviews
MATH2264 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH1263 reviews
MATH2703 reviews
2702 reviews
CALC1502 reviews
MATH642 reviews
19551 review
MATH1261301 review
MTH1501 review
MTH2261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 16 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 5 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2