AI Rate Professor

Media Arts Technologies

Min Choi

MAT155 · MAT180 · MAT185 · MAT135 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want strict industry-level critique and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy project loadInconsistent gradingHigh industry standardsPolarizing mentor
  • Students split between life-changing design growth and .
  • Workload is consistently heavy with weekly projects and high polish expectations.
  • Serious design students benefit most; casual learners often struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are common, but only after defending work .

Both formats show tough grading; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and industry-level polish make the content feel demanding.

Online and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory with participation-heavy design studio expectations.

A , but the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About two in ; fans praise growth while .

In-person is mixed-to-positive for serious designers; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

deductions, and style-matching pressure.

Format shift

Online fairness complaints are strongest; in-person still frequently says tough.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

, and high polish drafts create a very heavy load.

Format shift

Both formats report dense project cadence and large assignment volume.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and poor teaching for others.

Format shift

and real-world advice; online teaching reviews are poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

, and design deliverables rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and career-building, others cite vague demands and harsh marks.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“The workload was quite heavy but it was rewarding to see the .”
MAT135
“You can follow the assignments perfectly but be marked down for requirements pulled out of thin air.”
MAT135
“Yes this teacher can be difficult but oh my god my design skills have improved so much!”
MAT155

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative on fairness, rigid style matching, and .

Main concern

Unfair zeros, vague instructions, and zero room for creative exploration.

What students said

“I received a because I did not have the required software.”
MAT180
“Creativity, originality, and exploration are discouraged.”
MAT185
“She gives a and is the .”
MAT135

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe project and .

Project-based assessmentWeekly design projectsCritique-driven gradingNo traditional exams mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critiques with high standards.

Project critiquesHeavy assignment loadTough project grading
“You wont learn anything except for having a breakdown from .”
MAT155
“Keep in mind it's a time consuming class, but it pushes you to reach a more professional level.”
MAT135

Online

Online comments focus on weekly projects and harsh project scores, not exams.

Weekly projectsProject zerosStyle-matching grades
“She gives a and is the .”
MAT135
“I received a because I did not have the required software.”
MAT180

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Challenging but ! She constantly gives practical real-world advice on the industry rather than outdated information.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews highlighting a and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

22/100

“You can follow the assignments perfectly but be marked down for requirements pulled out of thin air.”

📚 Workload Intensity

18/100

“She gives a and is the .”

🚀 Skill Growth

75/100

“Yes this teacher can be difficult but oh my god my design skills have improved so much!”

👍 Split Recommendation

42/100

“ if you are serious about breaking into the industry.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her instructions are vague
  • Creativity, originality, and exploration are discouraged

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I feel the
  • as long as you want to learn more and get better she will be willing to help

Theme 3

💼 About Industry Standards

  • practical real-world advice on the industry
  • Students
  • she sets a high standard/expectation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve polarized reviews with but limited sample size.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MAT1356 reviews
MAT1853 reviews
MAT1552 reviews
MAT1801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1