AI Rate Professor

Ethnic Studies

Olivia Quintanilla

SOC207 · ETHN100 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate slow communication, especially online.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasLots of readingSlow email repliesTough graderSelf-taught online
  • Online sections are messy, slow to grade, and .
  • and rigid attendance or accessibility complaints.
  • A grades are possible with steady work, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students report As or A-minuses, but , and disputed zeros mean an A still takes consistent weekly work.

and ; in-person reviews more often cite late work or redo chances.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

, but weekly multi-hour reading and writing keep the load from feeling easy.

; online adds self-taught lectures and messy Canvas.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Online attendance is often not required, while .

Online evidence leans optional; as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Only about one-third would take again; praise for and accessibility complaints.

; online reviews more often say take someone else.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tough grader appears often; disputed finals and many students finish with As.

Format shift

Online has more grade-dispute stories; some in-person students note late work and redos.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and multi-hour video or reading loads dominate both formats.

Format shift

Online and ; honors students sometimes get extra assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

some find discussions engaging and and and unresponsive.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are warmer; online teaching is widely described as self-taught and messy.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and occasional finals rather than traditional exam banks.

Format shift

Online SOC207 students explicitly note no tests or exams; both formats center writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and engaging discussions to rigid absence policies and heavy reading.

Main concern

and high reading load; some report harsh treatment around absences or .

What students said

“ , if you need clarification or more time for an ”
ETHN100
“she said she would not excuse my absences and that if I missed another day I would be unable to pass this course.”
ETHN100
“ ! and the professor really wants you to succeed.”
SOC207

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report messy Canvas dates, minimal lectures, weekly reading and , and .

Main concern

Disorganization, slow responses, and tough or work.

What students said

“ and all the dates are mixed up and she doesn't edit them.”
ETHN100
“Definitely a self-taught course. Expect around 3 hours or so of ”
ETHN100
“NOT accessible outside of ”
ETHN100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize weekly writing and projects more than proctored exams, so .

Assignment-focusedDiscussion postsReading responsesFew traditional exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group work rather than detailing proctored exam rules.

Reading and writing heavyParticipationGroup projects
“Like someone else said, be ready for a lot of reading. it usually took me about 3-4hours to get the ”
ETHN100
“There is A LOT of .”
SOC207

Online

Online comments describe weekly discussions or reading responses and at least one class with no tests or exams; a .

No tests or exams in some sectionsDiscussion boardsReading responsesFinal project submissions
“Honestly an extremely easy class (no tests or one discussion post to do.”
SOC207
“For the and one document.”
ETHN100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews across online and , and accessibility. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ ”

📚

28/100

“Get ready for a lot of reading. it usually took me about 3-4hours to get the ”

🗂️ Organization Issues

30/100

“ and all the dates are mixed up and she doesn't edit them.”

❤️

70/100

“ , if you need clarification or more time for an ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Definitely a self-taught course
  • Prof. doesnt really do videos for lectures and leaves you to do all the
  • Very engaging class discussions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I assume she graded on completion
  • She said that I never uploaded the video and gave me a 0 on our final
  • if you follow instructions, you should be good

Theme 3

✉️ About Accessibility

  • I've reached out to her 10+ times over the semester and I've gotten two responses
  • Takes 2-3 emails before a response back
  • . Recommend!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen recent reviews across online and in-person ETHN100 and SOC207 show consistent themes of , and polarized accessibility.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ETHN10012 reviews
SOC2076 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A 8 · A- 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1