AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Emily Kay

MAT125 · MAT120 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Prefer her in person; online sections feel punishing unless you already code well.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough project graderStrong in-person mentorHarsh online rubricsCoding project heavyThorough lectures
  • In-person students praise clarity, care, and real multimedia or web skills learned.
  • Online students report harsh and little help.
  • Workload is project-driven with weekly coding or multimedia deliverables.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Grades cluster B to A-minus, but online rubrics dock many points for small issues despite heavy effort.

In-person students report fairer reward for work; online feels harsher.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Projects start early, cover multiple apps or coding skills, and .

; online students describe week-one difficulty more intensely.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

single strict policy dominating.

Online comments ; some in-person note yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

.

Recommendation is strongly format-dependent, favoring in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

small issues and no late work.

Format shift

In-person reviews feel fairer and .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly coding or multimedia projects, lectures, and a .

Format shift

Online 8-week pace intensifies the same project model.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Strong content knowledge and prep show up often, but online support quality is polarizing.

Format shift

In-person teaching scores near excellent; online scores near poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is almost entirely projects, coding assignments, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Same assignment focus online and in person; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and clear while still requiring real project effort.

Main concern

teaching is strong.

What students said

“Professor Kay definitely helped me to understand the ins and outs of multimedia.”
MAT120
“Amazing professor! It was extremely clear that she knew what she was talking about.”
MAT125
“ . Workload is fairly tedious but straightforward.”
MAT125

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly warn of , and little assignment help.

Main concern

and tough week-one projects with minimal support.

What students said

“Save yourself the .”
MAT120
“ but takes a LOT of .”
MAT125
“Expect to put in a lot of effort for a harsh grade.”
MAT120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Risk centers on picky project rubrics and a .

Weekly coding projectsFinal project heavyQuizzesNo late workDetailed feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a long final project without describing strict exam software.

Final projectClear grading criteriaProject feedback
“ ! Final grade is also dependent on how much time you put into it.”
MAT125
“ . Workload is fairly tedious but straightforward.”
MAT125

Online

Online students mention quizzes, weekly coding, and a .

Final projectWeekly coding assignmentsQuizzesNo late work
“Average on the . Median was barely passing. 1 quiz and 2 coding assignments a week.”
MAT125
“Doesn't accept late work. 1-2 hours of video lectures a week.”
MAT120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Expect to put in a lot of effort for a harsh grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting a . Credibility rating: Medium.

🖥️

28/100

“takes a LOT of . Average on the .”

🏫 In-Person Strength

85/100

“Amazing professor! It was extremely clear that she knew what she was talking about.”

📦 Project Load

32/100

“ ! Final grade is also dependent on how much time you put into it.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • Zero help with questions. Save yourself the .
  • Believe everything the review under me says.
  • Had to put 1.5x speed to hear normal speaking pace.

Theme 2

👩‍🏫

  • Prof.
  • I really enjoyed this course.
  • She is a great person, great professor, and puts noticeable effort into her course!

Theme 3

📐 About Difficulty & Grades

  • very easy to lose a lot of
  • Unfair grader with
  • Put in the time and you'll receive the grade you work for accordingly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews but recent and detailed, with a .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MAT1204 reviews
MAT1254 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 1 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values