AI Rate Professor

English

Jose Jara

ENGL201 · ENGL100 · ENG201 · ENG101 · ENGL200 · ENG100 · 212 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
43.16%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless , and chasing office-hour feedback.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtremely UnorganizedLate GradingTough Essay GraderMandatory AttendanceMixed Spam Reviews
  • Serious reviews repeatedly call courses chaotic with and
  • and tough scoring frustrate many students
  • A large cluster of joke or spam five-star reviews inflates raw stats and lowers trust

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Tough essay grading and hours and relentless revision, not ease.

Both formats call him a ; some In person students succeed with heavy office-hour effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and dense expectations make an intro English load feel harder than peers.

Online stress is chaos-driven; In .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tardies are graded and multiple absences can get students dropped.

In person policies are harshest; some .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Serious detailed reviews repeatedly beg students not to take him despite a noisy minority of spam praise.

Online and recent In ; joke five-star posts are not credible recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Strict grading appears in both formats; and In person.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Multiple major essays, drafts, readings, and frequent small tasks create a heavy load.

Format shift

So many papers is common Online and In person.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, and inconsistent communication define the experience.

Format shift

Online organization complaints are strongest; In person adds unhelpful class activities.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Courses revolve around essays, drafts, peer edits, and .

Format shift

Essay focus is consistent Online and In person; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENG classes mix , and occasional helpful office hours, plus many low-value spam praises.

Main concern

Grades often sit low until the while and late policies punish busy schedules.

What students said

“Jara did not grade 80-90% of our work until the last week that grades were due”
ENG100
“ If you don't show up to class, you WILL not get an A or even a B.”
ENG100
“ your own mental health.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are widely called the most unorganized Canvas experience, with buried instructions, long rambling Zooms, and .

Main concern

Students spend hours hunting rubrics and .

What students said

“The .”
ENG100
“There is SO MUCH MATERIAL, you don't even know where to start.”
ENG201
“You'll spend an hour just looking for the instructions for an assignment.”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and slow returns rather than documented proctored exams.

Essay heavyDelayed feedbackOccasional pop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person grades lean on essays and and .

Major essaysMandatory attendanceBeware of pop quizzes
“All and the activities you do in the class don't even go to your grade”
ENG100
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG100

Online

Online assessment is essay-centered with , and little clarity on formal exams.

Multiple major essaysUnclear rubricsLagged feedback
“The entire class .”
ENG100
“ , but you get it weeks ”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am begging you. . He is the most unorganized teacher that I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with spam five-star posts downweighted against detailed serious complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

24/100

“Jara did not grade 80-90% of our work until the last week that grades were due”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ your own mental health.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are him talking straight nonsense for an hour
  • Zoom videos would go off topic
  • classes feel pointless

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • rubric
  • expects alot from his students. There were 3 mayjor essays
  • he is a but offers in office hours

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • There's not organization at all.
  • Bombarded with so many resources that

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

212

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews give breadth, but many low-effort joke five-star posts conflict with consistent serious complaints about organization and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 520
3 out of 520
2 out of 540
1 out of 571

Course coverage

ENG10020 reviews
10014 reviews
ENG2016 reviews
ENG1015 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGL2001 review
ENGL2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 5 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

7

B 5 · B- 2

C range

10

C+ 5 · C 2 · C- 3

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 5