AI Rate Professor

Art

Sam Wohl

ART100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Good for students who want pushy art critique and ; online accessibility and consistency are real risks.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHonest art feedbackPolarizing graderParticipation requiredCreative challengeAccessibility concerns
  • In-person studio energy and constructive critique are often praised as fun and growth-focused.
  • Some online students report and slow or .
  • Attendance and participation matter, and at least one student raised serious caption accessibility issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students find it manageable with participation, while .

Online reviews are ; in person more often links good grades to showing up and projects.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

but are not described as pure busywork or brain-burners.

; online has more complaint about tedious assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple comments say attendance and participation affect recognition and grades.

In person is clearly attendance-sensitive; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About half strongly recommend him for fun growth, while and accessibility.

In person leans positive; online includes the harshest critiques.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

tough and inconsistent depending on the student.

Format shift

Online includes tough-grader complaints; in but helpful.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

; some online students still feel assignments are heavy or tedious.

Format shift

In person reduces outside work via studio time; online workload complaints are higher.

Teaching experience

Average

64/100

Many praise engaging lectures and caring critique, but accessibility failures and .

Format shift

In person teaching reputation is stronger; online quality is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is project and critique .

Format shift

, and critiques over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and constructive criticism if they show up and engage.

Main concern

and if missed.

What students said

“As long as you show up to class and do the and appreciate you.”
ART100
“you have to come to class or else he will lower your grade.”
ART100
“The assignments he gives are meant to challenge you as an artist and .”
ART100

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ART100 is mixed: some love detailed YouTube feedback and easy , and captions inaccessible.

Main concern

and incomplete lecture captions for disabled students.

What students said

“Prof. Wohl made this class super easy and fun. if you are taking it online and is very detailed with them.”
ART100
“He is a and often gives low grades even for hard work.”
ART100
“By the end of the semester, 2 out of maybe 12-13 lectures had captions enabled.”
ART100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; grades come from art projects, critiques, and participation.

Project BasedCritiquesParticipationYouTube Feedback OnlineNo Traditional Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on class project time, critiques, and .

Studio ProjectsCritiquesAttendance LinkedConstructive Criticism
“The class focuses so you don't have to do much work outside of class.”
ART100
“He gives honest feedback and will push you .”
ART100

Online

, and subjective grading rather than proctored tests.

Project AssignmentsYouTube FeedbackSubjective Grading
“ if you are taking it online and is very detailed with them.”
ART100
“ , and he takes so .”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Wohl was great! As long as you show up to class and do the and appreciate you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 polarized ART100 reviews across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“This class was a lot of fun and I look forward to taking his classes again in upcoming semesters.”

⚖️

48/100

“He is a and often gives low grades even for hard work.”

♿ Accessibility Concern

20/100

“Sam Wohl's class was so .”

💯 Recommendation

58/100

“If you're thinking about taking his class, do it!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really wants you to be able to understand the techniques and is willing to work individually to help you.
  • as an artist
  • He's also is not afraid to joke around with you when it's appropriate!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and hard but he really works with you
  • to improve.
  • you have to come to class or else he will lower your grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Access

  • I had to ask him probably 5-6 times on different occasions to enable closed captioning for his lectures
  • By the end of the semester, 2 out of maybe 12-13 lectures had captions enabled.
  • he takes so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 8 reviews with polarized quality scores and limited course variety reduce confidence in stable patterns.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1008 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values