AI Rate Professor

Art

Jaqueline LO

ART101 · ART204 · ART202ACRYLIC · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Solid pick for studio art if you show up and submit quality work, but expect and mixed communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackParticipation mattersHands-on studio styleMixed grading reputationApproachable artist
  • , and hands-on help.
  • A sharp minority report unprofessional communication and harsh or .
  • Online ART101 felt easy and supportive; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic if you turn work in on time and , but tough or .

The sole online review reported an easy A; in-person reviews more often mention tough or .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is mostly studio practice and , though quality expectations still matter.

Online student called assignments easy; in-person students still describe manageable studio work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

because class time is used for hands-on work and participation.

In-person tags and comments stress skip-class risks; the as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and studio help, but a vocal minority strongly advises against her.

Online evidence is strongly positive; in-person opinions split between 10/10 praise and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and , but multiple students report tough or lowest-possible grades even when work matches demos.

Format shift

Online student praised clear criteria; .

Workload

Light

74/100

Assignments and and submit on time.

Format shift

Both formats describe light-to-moderate art .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Often described as patient, helpful, and knowledgeable in studio settings, with one recent scathing teaching critique.

Format shift

Online feedback is glowing; worst teacher.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and studio work rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Evidence across formats centers on assignments and critiques, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person studio classes feel loose and hands-on with , but and communication unprofessional.

Main concern

Polarized grading fairness and one .

What students said

“This is the . She helps you understand the concepts and is always there to help.”
ART101
“worst teacher . first off her grading is off, second her level of communication is unprofessional.”
ART101
“ and is very patient and helpful throughout the class, but she is a .”
ART204

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One recent online ART101 student loved short , and easy assignments for an A.

Main concern

Only one online review, so the positive picture may not generalize.

What students said

“Loved taking this art class with her! Her lectures are super short and her hands .”
ART101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and critiques more than formal exams, with .

Project-based gradingStudio critiquesParticipation-based

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

project quality and participation, not formal test policy.

Studio lab formatProject quality expectations
“She gives a small art lecture at the beginning of class and the rest of the class is used mostly for painting or sketching.”
ART202ACRYLIC

Online

Online student focused on short lectures, videos, and assignments rather than formal exams.

Assignment-basedInstructional videos
“ an online art class.”
ART101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the . She helps you understand the concepts and is always there to help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in , and polarized experiences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎨 Studio Teaching

68/100

“Professor Lo is really a talented and thoughtful artist and teacher.”

⚖️

48/100

“even if you do it exactly right she will give you the lowest grade possible.”

💬

74/100

“She gets back to you promptly and will work with you for your needs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are super short and her hands .
  • Her classes are really loose, and really are more just a .
  • She is gentle with her art critiques.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Make sure you turn everything in on time and you wont have an issue.
  • I do think she sometimes graded harshly
  • She is a .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • worst teacher .
  • her level of communication is unprofessional.
  • Does not offer make up work, does not offer help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews spanning 2012-2025 give a useful range of views, but the small sample and strong polarization lower certainty.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1015 reviews
ART202ACRYLIC1 review
ART2041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values