AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Pierre Goueth

CHEM110 · CHEM100 · CHEM112 · CHEM104 · CHEM150 · CHEM140 · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if and tolerate a tough, uneven experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing Chem ProfThick Accent BarrierTough Timed ExamsDrops Lowest GradesSelf-Study Heavy
  • some love his humor and problem walkthroughs, many struggle with accent, pace, and organization.
  • , and surviving tough timed tests.
  • Online sections draw more complaints about responsiveness and unreadable structure than in-person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Drops and help, but tough timed exams and strict grading mean an A .

Online timed-test pain is harsher; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Chemistry content plus fast lectures and students.

Both formats call chem hard; online organization issues make it feel worse.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as optional and others as mandatory or participation-linked, so flexibility is inconsistent.

and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; strong love-or-hate split based on learning style and format.

In-person fans exist; online recommendations are weaker overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Often labeled a , though lowest homework and blow.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize harsh .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Frequent homework, labs, quizzes, and .

Format shift

and test prep.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and humor; many cannot understand the accent or get useful help.

Format shift

In-person teaching is more mixed; online teaching is mostly poorly reviewed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Quizzes and and labs supporting but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and ; critics cite accent, sarcasm, and intimidation.

Main concern

Accent, fast pace, and .

What students said

“If you put in effort you'll be 100% fine!”
CHEM150
“Only way I got through this class was teaching myself from the textbook”
CHEM140
“ . I had to create a case with student affairs on his bullying behavior”
CHEM140

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and self-taught labs.

Main concern

Poor online explanation and .

What students said

“He does not teach well in an online format, especially for a lab class”
CHEM150
“The class is a nightmare; , and there is zero support”
CHEM150
“ students emails”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and not always well synced to lectures, making them strict for many students.

Timed ExamsNo Cheat SheetsTest HeavyStudy Guides Sometimes Late

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but no cheat sheets and limited study-guide alignment raise the stakes.

No Note CardsDrops Lowest ExamTest Heavy
“He does not allow note ”
CHEM112
“There is no guidance and exams”
CHEM140

Online

Online students report short time limits, scanning work stress, and .

Short Time LimitsTimed Online TestsScanning Work
“No time to complete tests, most Q's were VERY time consuming”
CHEM150
“Was so sensitive to us emailing him about having trouble with timed exams and scanning work for them”
CHEM140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Only way I got through this class was teaching myself from the textbook. There is no guidance and exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting the , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

48/100

“ and guides you through each problem to ensure you understand the material”

👎 Online Struggle

30/100

“He does not teach well in an online format, especially for a lab class”

⚖️

34/100

“He's a ”

🧪

38/100

“Only way I got through this class was teaching myself from the textbook”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He brings humor into lectures, which made class more engaging
  • Thick accent and it made concepts more challenging
  • his dry humor is hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and difficult and dont always resemble lecture
  • If you put in effort you'll be 100% fine!

Theme 3

⚠️ Support And Climate

  • never responded to students emails, questions, etc
  • will make you feel stupid for asking a question
  • he is a very caring professor and his dry humor is hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years and both formats with stable , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 532
4 out of 523
3 out of 515
2 out of 516
1 out of 518

Course coverage

CHEM15015 reviews
CHEM14010 reviews
CHEM1048 reviews
CHEM1108 reviews
CHEM1127 reviews
Show 1 more courses
CHEM1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 4 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

6

C+ 3 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 6