AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Virginia Tasulis

Courses not reported · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Proceed only if you can document original work carefully and tolerate delayed grades; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing graderSlow gradingAI suspicion complaintsExtra credit availableCaring for some students
  • and fair, half call her rude, condescending, and AI-obsessed.
  • .
  • and style; others report unfair deductions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earn A with honest effort and ; and AI-based penalties.

Online reviews dominate both Easy A praise and harsh-grader complaints; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material ranges from manageable intro psych to hard complicated 205 project work depending on the course.

Online 205 often called hard; some 101 sections called manageable with , and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and not mandatory across online sections with no strong consensus.

Most data is online; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and students who warn others to run.

Online holds the full polarization; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, and unfair-grade claims outweigh the students who call her fair with .

Format shift

Online polarizes hardest; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Decent weekly work and semester projects; some call lots of homework while others say graded items are few but high stakes.

Format shift

Online 205 is project-heavy; some 101 summers feel lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Supportive and ; rude, vague, and uninspiring for others, averaging to mixed quality.

Format shift

Almost all teaching commentary is online.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of discussions, projects, midterms, finals, and occasional rather than pure exams.

Format shift

Online comments mention and long projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and unclear standing.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She literally hasn't even graded the last 2 months worth of assignments so if you are in any way concerned about staying on top of your .”
205

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online Psych/CHAD sections swing from incredible support and to , and tough grading.

Main concern

Perceived AI policing, uneven fairness, and .

What students said

“She assumes that ChatGPT writes everything that I wrote for ”
205
“If you value your GPA or .”
101
“Lots of opportunities throughout the semester too.”
101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments include midterms, finals, discussions, and major projects; .

Midterm and finalGroup discussionsSemester projectExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Single review does not describe exam format, only multi-month ungraded assignments.

Delayed grading
“She literally hasn't even graded the last 2 months worth of assignments”
205

Online

Online sections use midterms, finals, weekly discussions or ; no proctoring software mentioned.

MidtermFinalDiscussionsSemester projectExtra credit
“it was manageable, a midterm, final, and .”
101
“205 is a semester-long project so not many assings due, but very important to do it all.”
205
“Lots of opportunities throughout the semester too.”
101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the . Tasulis is rude, condescending, and acts like she hates teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (9 online, 1 in-person), capturing the strong split between fans and critics. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚡ Polarized Experience

50/100

“My 2nd class with Prof Gin and .”

🤖

30/100

“She assumes that ChatGPT writes everything that I wrote for ”

⏳

28/100

“She literally hasn't even graded the last 2 months worth of assignments”

🎁 Help

70/100

“Lots of opportunities throughout the semester too.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • material is not very well explained or easily digestible
  • straightforward, helps where she can
  • class is unbearably boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades everything unfairly
  • Give honest effort and you'll receive an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • so understanding and really gives you all the material
  • rude, condescending
  • carding, understanding and always ready to help you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten recent reviews with strong detail and ; sample is enough for trends but opinions are highly split.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

1015 reviews
2055 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2