AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Steve Eso

SOC104 · STATS104 · PSYC220 · PSYC104 · PSYC205 · PSYC204 · PSY104 · PSYCH115 · MATH104 · PSYC115 · 170 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
88.68%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will stay on top of weekly work; he makes hard material feel doable.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStats Made FunScaffolded Research PaperFree Self-Written TextbookClear FeedbackHilarious Lectures
  • Turns intimidating stats and .
  • pieces so you never face one huge dump.
  • Do the weekly readings, notes, and quizzes and an A is very realistic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students , and scaffolded paper pieces and an A is realistic.

Both online and an A; online adds stay current on modules.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is statistics and research methods but his textbook, humor, and guided steps lower the intellectual barrier.

In-person reviews stress how lectures demystify stats; and free text.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

, while others say attendance is optional if you keep up.

; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly all recent reviews urge taking him for stats or research methods because , and fair.

Strong recommendation holds for both formats; a few older non-stats courses are less glowing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and completion-friendly on homework; and usually constructive.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly readings, OARs, short quizzes, and a but paced.

Format shift

Online students emphasize weekly module load; and paper scaffolding.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly call him funny, clear, and the .

Format shift

Praise is strong in both formats; rare harsh reviews cluster in older non-core courses.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grade centers on weekly notes, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize weekly work and the big paper; exams are mentioned as easier or open-note.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise , and a caring style that makes stats less scary.

Main concern

and a if you procrastinate.

What students said

“This was my second time taking Statistics and he made Statistics less scary and quite fun actually.”
PSYC104
“Not many great Psychology professor like Eso!”
PSYC205

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections stay organized with , and a scaffolded research paper; students call him accessible and clear.

Main concern

Falling behind on weekly modules hurts more online because the .

What students said

“Each week, you are required to , and write towards your research paper.”
PSYC205
“Just do the work and you'll get an A. Very understanding as well.”
PSYC104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and a scaffolded paper rather than brutal closed finals.

Open notes quizzesWeekly short quizzesScaffolded final paperFew high-stakes exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students , and easy exams if you do the work.

Open notes quizzesShort quizzesEasy exams if prepared
“ .”
PSYC205
“Quizzes and .”
PSYC104

Online

Online reviews describe weekly quizzes and a paper built in pieces; .

Weekly quizzesScaffolded research paperRecorded lectures
“The everything all together.”
PSYC205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“TAKE HIS CLASS! Will not disappoint.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person stats and research methods. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“By far the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“If you're thinking of taking this class for :)”

📘 Workload Reality

55/100

“Expect lots of reading for WEEKLY OARs (outline-application-reaction) + small quizzes + application assignment.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

82/100

“This class is EASY if you do the work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes learning fun.
  • He .
  • His style of and thorough.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the work and you'll get an A.
  • Quizzes and .
  • Pretty manageable class for research methods.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • The professor was very understanding and communicated reliably outside of class.
  • He is always happy to answer any questions.
  • Accepted late work very cool professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

170

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews across many years, mostly consistent praise for stats and research methods with .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5106
4 out of 527
3 out of 56
2 out of 513
1 out of 518

Course coverage

PSYC20516 reviews
PSYC10414 reviews
PSY1048 reviews
PSYC1154 reviews
PSYC2202 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PSYCH1152 reviews
MATH1041 review
PSYC2041 review
SOC1041 review
STATS1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

38

A+ 10 · A 27 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1