AI Rate Professor

Biological Sciences

Miranda Mitchem

BIO211 · BIO2093 · BIO110 · BIO220 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
67.5%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will read the book, use objectives, and want a caring physio teacher; avoid if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtra credit heavyLecture denseCaring but unevenLots of readingPolarizing physiology
  • Physiology and bio with her is content-heavy and reading-intensive.
  • Many students love her care and ; and exams mismatched.
  • Labs and , but tests and pace frustrate a large minority.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with steady work, reading, and , but material and and averages can be low.

Online and ; is more celebrated in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physiology content is dense, lecture-heavy, and .

Both formats call the material heavy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Most recent reviews mark attendance mandatory even when the vibe is somewhat laid back.

Older pandemic-era reviews were more flexible; newer ones lean mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

; love for care and fairness clashes with complaints about organization and exams.

; some online cohorts are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Labs and , but many label her a tough grader on exams.

Format shift

; in-person extra-credit praise is stronger.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Expect , and multiple exams or pop quizzes.

Format shift

Online students especially compare the load to several classes at once.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Warm and knowledgeable for many, but others find lectures unfocused, inaccurate, or non-engaging.

Format shift

Polarization appears in both formats; online negatives cluster around organization and help.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Four or more exams plus quizzes dominate; labs and but .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students either call her a gem who makes hard physio passable with , or , and rushed material.

Main concern

Heavy material plus uneven lecture clarity and occasional illness-driven cramming.

What students said

“Professor Mitchem is a gem! if you can.”
BIO220
“ , and study guides were pointless.”
BIO110
“Tons of .”
BIO220

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some praise study guides and flexibility; , and little help.

Main concern

Disorganization, delayed grades, and .

What students said

“As long as you put in the work and do the assigments you will be fine!”
BIO220
“I would take someone else, this teacher is way too much. There is is A LOT of .”
BIO220
“The , and every section comes with a cheat/sheet type objectives page”
BIO2093

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent and often hard; study objectives help when used, but .

Multiple examsStudy guides or lecture objectivesExtra credit on examsPop quizzes in some termsTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult tests, sometimes vague free-response, with and .

Extremely difficult testsExtra credit on examsLabs easyLecture objectives
“the . The class is very laid back though. Tons of .”
BIO220
“Exams felt randomclass average was around 50%.”
BIO110

Online

Online comments mention study guides, book-based exams, and .

Study guidesBook-based examsPop quizzesHard exams
“Gives study guides. Use your book it's a useful tool.”
BIO220
“Get ready for the .”
BIO220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Physiology is a tough subject but and exciting to learn. !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews across BIO110/211/220 online and in person. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She's a nice woman but her teaching style is not engaging at all.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“it seem like I was taking 4 classes its to much work.”

❤️ Care &

70/100

“I wish more professors tried to help their students as much as Dr. mitchem did.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes lectures simple
  • Lectures are all over the place
  • her love for

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Material is heavy and challenging.
  • Very difficult to fail her class.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • incredibly caring and empathetic
  • really rude. Always in a hurry.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

40 reviews across online and in-person physio/bio from 2019-2026 with .

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

BIO22027 reviews
BIO20937 reviews
BIO2114 reviews
BIO1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

20

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 8

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 7

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1