AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Karl Cleveland

FLASH150 · MAT175 · ART247 · MAT150 · FLASH190 · MAT215 · IMT145 · MAT190 · MAT165 · MAT235 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Only take Cleveland if you are self-driven with projects and can tolerate .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLate GradingProject HeavyClear ExplainerCareer-FocusedLow Interaction Online
  • , and industry-relevant web/animation projects.
  • Recent and poor communication.
  • Online sections are especially poorly received for and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and perfect polish for top marks, while missing mid-semester grades makes targeting an A harder.

Online reviews stress harsh first-project standards; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content is teachable and resource-rich but and polish expectations keep it from feeling easy.

Online beginner JS felt advanced; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Several sections mark attendance mandatory, though .

Evidence is mostly in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

because and low interaction outweigh older praise for teaching skill.

Both online reviews say no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The issue is not harsh rubrics so much as .

Format shift

and recent in-person MAT150.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Projects often take 8-16 hours each and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and industry-current, but recent experience is dragged down by silence and late grades.

Format shift

; online teaching quality scores are very low.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment centers on large projects and course-site work rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Historically strong praise for clear lectures and helpful projects, but .

Main concern

Grades stay a mystery until after the semester ends.

What students said

“Karl is one of the . I've taken 4 classes with him and he is a .”
MAT235
“he didn't grade mine or any other students work until after the end of the semester.”
MAT150
“Expect at least 8-16 hours of work for if unprepared.”
MAT190

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

beginner JS felt advanced, work lived on .

Main concern

No mid-semester grades and complicated off-Canvas workflow leave students guessing.

What students said

“Supposed to be a beginner Javascript class and is absolutely NOT for beginners.”
MAT175
“Doesn't grade any work throughout the entire semester. One of the .”
MAT150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize multi-hour projects and little mention of formal proctored exams.

Project BasedLittle Exam DetailOff-Canvas Course Site

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam proctoring or format.

Project heavyPortfolio opportunities
“Expect at least 8-16 hours of work for if unprepared or procrastinate like me.”
MAT190

Online

Online work is posted on his own website with large early projects; no webcam or Lockdown details are stated.

Own course websiteLarge first projectLittle Canvas use
“He only posts the classwork through his own website instead of .”
MAT175

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Karl is a nice guy, but he didn't grade mine or any other students work until after the end of the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews with strong historical praise and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

70/100

“ , and he makes sure everyone is on the same page before he continues.”

⏳

25/100

“your grades gonna stay a mystery for the whole semester.”

👎 Recommendation Drag

35/100

“ .”

🛠️ Project Workload

28/100

“Expect at least 8-16 hours of work for if unprepared or procrastinate like me.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and also seems to be a truly kind person who cares about students.
  • Awesome teacher. .
  • He goes the extra mile to setup opportunities for outside web development and portfolio building.

Theme 2

📉 and Feedback

  • he didn't grade mine or any other students work until after the end of the semester.
  • Doesn't grade any work throughout the entire semester.
  • .

Theme 3

💻 About Course Work

  • He has you make an entire game for the first assignment and expects perfect functionality with a beautiful user interface in order to get an A.
  • the lectures and content are set up in a way where there is a lot of resources to get through the material if needed.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews span many years with a and recent grading-communication complaints.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MAT1506 reviews
MAT1902 reviews
MAT2352 reviews
ART2471 review
FLASH1501 review
Show 5 more courses
FLASH1901 review
IMT1451 review
MAT1651 review
MAT1751 review
MAT2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2