AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Sasha Carter

EARTH106 · OCEAN · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you like a caring science teacher and will use ; skip if you need tight organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Extra CreditCaring but DisorganizedPolarizing LecturesScience FriendlyOff Topic Talk
  • and disorganized, hard-to-follow lectures.
  • and support make grades recoverable for engaged students.
  • Online is thin evidence and one student preferred in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Heavy and care help many pass or earn high marks, but tests and confusion still cost some students.

In-person reviews drive this; the one online A+ still called the course hard to understand.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Earth and ocean content is manageable with study guides, yet lectures and modules confuse some.

In-person difficulty spans 2-4; online felt harder to follow for the single reviewer.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and optional, with scolding for missing activities in at least one section.

Most evidence is in person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

; love his care or hate his disorganization.

Online student still recommends but prefers in person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Heavy and a desire for students to pass offset tests that previously caused failures.

Format shift

appears in both formats; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Quizzes about every three weeks, a project, readings, and .

Format shift

In-person Ocean and EARTH106 describe the structure; online adds little detail.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Caring and sometimes engaging, but frequent critiques of disorganization, off-topic talk, and weak delivery.

Format shift

In-person reviews swing 1 to 5; the lone online review is positive on care but weaker on clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and large .

Format shift

In-person comments give the clearest mix; online mainly notes .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In and extra-credit heavy, yet several students slam disorganization and off-topic lectures.

Main concern

, and uneven lecture focus.

What students said

“he gave many (HEAVY) opportunities for all of us!”
EARTH106
“ . Lectures go off topic, modules make no sense”
Ocean
“The best professor I've had, hands down. He was amazing all semester, knew how to keep engagement in class, and .”
EARTH106

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single online review says he cares and gives but the online course was harder to follow than in person.

Main concern

; reviewer preferred an in-person version.

What students said

“ as his online course was a bit hard to understand at times.”
EARTH106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams come with study guides and , and heavy .

Study GuidesQuizzes Every Few WeeksHeavy Extra CreditEnd Project

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams use clear study guides for some sections; quizzes and a .

Clear Study GuidesQuizzes Every 3 WeeksProjectHeavy Extra Credit
“ ”
EARTH106
“There is a . There is quizzes every 3 weeks.”
Ocean

Online

Online evidence mentions and a desire to help .

Extra CreditPass Focused
“his gives out a good amount of , and really wants you to pass.”
EARTH106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's just a and participate. He's had classes in the past where students failed because of tests, so he gave many (HEAVY) opportunities for all of us!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 polarized Earth Science reviews with one online sample. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“his lectures are dreadful to be in”

👍 Care & Support

75/100

“Professor Carter is incredibly respectful and cares about his students.”

📂 Organization Risk

30/100

“ . Lectures go off topic, modules make no sense”

🎁 Lifeline

80/100

“he gave many (HEAVY) opportunities for all of us!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • knew how to keep engagement in class
  • talks a little too much sometimes about something off topic
  • his lectures are fun and full of the information you can really soak in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he gave many (HEAVY) opportunities
  • There is quizzes every 3 weeks.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • his handwriting (and somehow even

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews with strong polarization, one online only, and solid recent detail but inconsistent experiences reduce certainty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EARTH1066 reviews
Ocean3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2