AI Rate Professor

Art History

Martina Hesser

ART259 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if you can; current reviews paint a harsh, low-support art history experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLecture heavyLots of homeworkHarsh with little feedbackAvoid
  • .
  • Classes feel boring, lecture-heavy, and unforgiving of struggles.
  • No review recommends taking her again.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report and little path to recover even with effort.

Both online and ; no easy-A evidence appears.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about masters-level standards, dense lectures, and .

Online and in-person both frame the course as hard and draining.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

, but that does not improve the overall experience.

and in-person notes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review is strongly negative and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and comments about harsh, unforgiving scoring dominate the sample.

Format shift

and in-person ART259 reviews.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Students cite lots of , and test pressure.

Format shift

; in-person emphasizes weekly videos and test-heavy design.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say she seems not to care, lectures nonstop without interaction, and fails to help them learn.

Format shift

Online focuses on care and ; in-person focuses on boring lectures and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments emphasize tests with .

Format shift

structures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe excessive workload, nonstop boring lectures, no interaction, and .

Main concern

or feedback.

What students said

“She's unforgiving, even if you have a disability. She doesn't care about your struggles and grades harshly.”
ART259
“Lectures non stop for entire class period. . Extremely boring.”
ART259

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The and arbitrary, with masters-level expectations and no student care.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Teacher doesn't seem to care about the students, just grades harshly for no reason at all.”
ART259

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and tests are described as strict and unforgiving, with .

Harsh test gradingLittle test feedbackTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report test-heavy assessment and .

Test heavyNo test feedbackFour tests
“ , so you don't actually learn.”
ART259
“No work other than 4 tests.”
ART259

Online

The online review says she invents reasons to fail tests and grades at an unrealistically high standard.

Harsh test gradingStrict standards
“makes things up about the reason she fails you on a test. Strict for no reason”
ART259

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in and low support. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ ”

⚖️

10/100

“just grades harshly for no reason at all”

😫 Workload Stress

18/100

“The workload is excessive, especially the weekly videos.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures non stop for entire class period
  • Extremely boring
  • Teacher doesn't seem to care about the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grades harshly
  • grades you as if you are going for your masters degree

Theme 3

💔 About Support

  • She's unforgiving, even if you have a disability
  • this class drained my joy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews, two recent and one from 2010, all negative but too few for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART2593 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values