AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Thong Nguyen

OCHEM2 · CHEM112 · CHEM108 · CHEM210 · CHEM211 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will grind for ochem and use his practice materials; look elsewhere if you need a free A or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEXTRA CREDITAmazing lecturesCaringTest heavyAccessible outside class
  • , and office access help motivated students succeed in tough ochem.
  • , and grade-heavy, so an A still demands serious weekly study.
  • Flipped or hybrid formats often make lecture attendance optional, but labs and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As and A-minuses appear often, but ; many warn you must work hard and some get B or C despite effort.

Online and ; recent Chem112 in-person comments sound a bit more forgiving with sheet and EC.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Ochem and related chem are repeatedly called hard, time-consuming, cumulative, and .

Both formats rate content as hard; Chem112 gen chem is easier than 210/211 ochem.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Many flipped or hybrid sections make lecture optional while labs and participation still matter; .

Online and ; older in-person sections more often mark mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

About seven in and support, tempered by hard exams and .

; online has more mixed quality ratings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

, partial credit, and late-work flexibility appear often, but and tough cumulative exams keep grading from feeling free.

Format shift

Recent Chem112 in-person reviews sound more generous; ochem online and .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students report lots of , and .

Format shift

Workload is heavy in both formats; hybrid dry labs and daily summer lectures can intensify the pace.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and accessibility, despite a vocal minority who find him unhelpful or smug.

Format shift

Strong teaching praise in both formats; negative outliers exist online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Most of the grade rides on multiple hard cumulative exams and a and .

Format shift

Test-heavy language appears in online and in-person ochem reviews alike.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Most in-person students call him one of the and fair help, while others warn exams are extremely hard and grade-dominant.

Main concern

workers.

What students said

“One of the :)”
Chem112
“His exams are NOTHING like the study guides and .”
CHEM210
“ work to get an A.”
CHEM211

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and hybrid students praise clear videos, practice tests, and accessibility, while a , and unsympathetic to outside obligations.

Main concern

and good resources.

What students said

“Dr. Nguyen posts practice tests which helped me achieve an A in the course.”
CHEM210
“ and .”
CHEM210
“You'll need to put in the time but he does a great job teaching material”
CHEM211

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are hard and cumulative with limited curving, but , and occasional full note sheets make them more navigable than pure trap tests.

Cumulative examsPractice testsExtra creditNote sheet allowedNo curvePartial credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report hard cumulative exams that dominate the grade, often with a full reminder sheet, practice materials, partial credit, and .

Full reminder sheetCumulative hard examsPractice examsPartial creditExtra credit
“Allowed 1 whole sheet for exams. .”
Chem112
“ work to get an A.”
CHEM211
“ but partial credit is granted.”
CHEM211

Online

Online and hybrid reviews describe several exams plus a , and ; proctoring tools are not clearly proven.

Practice testsNo curveMultiple exams and finalExtra credit points
“Dr. Nguyen posts practice tests which helped me achieve an A in the course.”
CHEM210
“4 exams & 1 final, no curve. Offers max 10 points.”
CHEM210
“ and .”
CHEM210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Thong is amazing. His class is pretty easy as long as you pay attention. He makes everything easy to understand. Allowed 1 whole sheet for exams. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 chemistry reviews spanning gen chem through ochem, . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ and to the point, and and notes that are MUCH easier to understand than the textbook slides other teachers use.”

📚

42/100

“ work to get an A.”

🎁 Support Resources

75/100

“Dr. Nguyen posts practice tests which helped me achieve an A in the course.”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“ . I don't understand why his rating isn't higher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes everything easy to understand.
  • He's a great professor who makes an intimidating material really digestible.
  • and illuminating.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You definitely need to put in the work and the hours because it is a difficult class
  • work to get an A.
  • Ochem is a hard class is what he says.

Theme 3

🧪

  • Allowed 1 whole sheet for exams. .
  • .
  • but partial credit is granted.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-six reviews across Chem108 to ochem from 2015 to 2026 give a large, multi-year, detailed sample with .

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

CHEM21018 reviews
CHEM21112 reviews
CHEM1082 reviews
Chem1122 reviews
OCHEM22 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 3 · A 11 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3