AI Rate Professor

Music

Arlie Langager

MUS141 · MUS161 · MUS165 · MUSIC141 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and can handle high-pressure, high-criticism vocal or choir settings.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderDemoralizing FeedbackRun AwayMandatory AttendanceInconsistent Expectations
  • Most recent students , and little real learning.
  • Attendance and participation are tightly enforced with shaming for absences or trip conflicts.
  • A few older or outlier reviews praise passion, but the dominant modern consensus is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and high, shifting expectations make strong grades hard even with heavy effort.

Almost all evidence is in person; the one online review also was not grade-friendly.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Repertoire pressure, participation demands, and high standards make the work feel hard and stressful.

In person studio and choir reviews drive this; online adds lack of instruction rather than content depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

failure risk for absences.

In ; the online review also marked attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

and most students urge others to find a different instructor.

Negative consensus is strongest in recent in person reviews; online sample is tiny but also negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and complaints about unrealistic standards and .

Format shift

In person reviews dominate this judgment.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and high participation load.

Format shift

In person choir and voice courses report heavy preparation demands.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is poor treatment, little constructive teaching, and students not learning.

Format shift

One online review says zero teaching; many in person reviews call the class a waste or regret.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment mixes participation, homework, repertoire, and performance expectations .

Format shift

; participation and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person chamber and voice courses are , and claims of little improvement.

Main concern

Students report discouraging or and unstable requirements.

What students said

“Run away! Run away! Stay away!!!!!”
MUS141
“omg everyone was afraid to say anything in class.”
MUS165
“she has had many of my peers CRYING because of her discouraging, cruel words.”
MUS141

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review reports zero instruction, zero lectures, and long non-response periods.

Main concern

No teaching presence online and lost interest in the music program.

What students said

“There was zero instruction, zero lectures, no ability to ask questions, and .”
MUS141

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment feels high-stakes and unforgiving, with pop quizzes and harsh performance standards mentioned.

Pop QuizzesParticipation HeavyPerformance Standards

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person students report tough standards, pop quizzes, and fear of speaking in class.

Pop QuizzesTough Performance StandardsFear Of Speaking
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MUS141
“you can't ask questions or make a comment she'll bite your head off.”
MUS165

Online

Single online review describes and no interactive teaching; .

No LecturesNon Responsive
“There was zero instruction, zero lectures, no ability to ask questions, and .”
MUS141

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run away! Run away! Stay away!!!!! Mus 100 is not a !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, heavily weighted to recent in person music lessons and . Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Overall Experience

18/100

“ ”

👎 Recommendation

16/100

“ ”

💬 Classroom Climate

15/100

“omg everyone was afraid to say anything in class.”

⚖️

18/100

“Hard to please”

Theme 1

💔 About Treatment

  • it could turn into being laughed at or having mistakes imitated in a way that felt mocking
  • she has had many of my peers CRYING because of her discouraging, cruel words.
  • Life .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard to please
  • Unrealistic expectations.
  • I did not experience measurable improvement

Theme 3

🏃 Student Verdict

  • Run away! Run away! Stay away!!!!!
  • don't. Just don't. Find another way.
  • find somebody else!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews with a large recent cluster of detailed negative accounts and only sparse positive outliers.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MUS14112 reviews
MUS16512 reviews
MUS1612 reviews
MUSIC1411 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 3

B range

12

B+ 1 · B 7 · B- 4

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1