AI Rate Professor

English

Scott Underwood

ENGL201 · ENG201 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

English class; unless you can chase him for missing posts.

Best fit · Easy A HunterIn-Person GemOnline ChaosEasy GraderCreative ProjectsAI Accusations
  • In-person students call him inspirational, funny, and .
  • Online sections often turn disorganized with late posts, vague rubrics, and .
  • Grades are generally easy, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many As and A+s appear even among frustrated students; he is repeatedly called an .

Both formats report easy grades; online still awards high marks despite chaos.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Reading and creative projects replace heavy theory; content feels .

and fun; online feels harder only because of poor logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is sometimes mandatory for participation, but many online students report .

; online is often more flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Strong love for warnings and AI grading drama.

; online reviews .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students call him an , though AI flags and random point cuts appear online.

Format shift

Lenient overall; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Many papers and projects, but weekly writing is often short and not described as crushing.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of papers; summer online can feel lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Charismatic and , but online disorganization and unreachable periods pull the score down.

Format shift

In-person teaching is excellent; online teaching is poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation rather than classic exams.

Format shift

Same assignment-heavy pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and inspiring with and memorable lectures.

Main concern

One student felt he was inflexible when a peer faced a serious illness.

What students said

“this class is a lot of fun. Made it even worth waking up at the butt crack of dawn to come to class.”
ENG201
“Scott is the coolest English prof. He takes a unique approach to learning which really stuck with me!”
ENGL201
“He made this girl who found out she had cancer to still do the and .”
ENGL201

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ENG/ENGL201 is often fun early, then becomes disorganized with , and .

Main concern

Unreachable communication, vague posts, and .

What students said

“ !!! .”
ENGL201
“Blamed me for .”
ENGL201
“Easy A but very frustrating.”
ENGL201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans papers and projects; some classes swap a if people participate.

Project-based final optionPapers over sit-down examsCreative assignments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment emphasizes discussion, papers, and .

Discussion-heavy workMultiple papersSpecific instructor feedback
“Be ready to talk in class, work with other individuals, and .”
ENG201
“The novels read during class were interesting and I loved the .”
ENGL201

Online

Online work is assignment and paper based; a few students report AI detection on the .

Paper finalsAI detection via TurnitinVague online assignment posts
“TurnItIn's system told him. A system that also tells you how they get things wrong!”
ENG201
“if people participate in class he will change the .”
ENG201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! . He's an amazing human, great teacher, but he is not tech savvy”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (12 online, 3 in person), highlighting format split and . Credibility rating: High.

🏫 In-Person Magic

90/100

“Scott is the coolest English prof. He takes a unique approach to learning which really stuck with me!”

💻 Online Chaos

25/100

“became absolutely UNREACHABLE outside of class and ”

🎯 Easy A Reality

82/100

“This was by far the easiest class I have ever taken.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is hilarious and made learning interesting and fun.
  • up.
  • Really rewards creativity.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A but very frustrating.
  • He is an .
  • If you put in effort and do the .

Theme 3

💻 About Online Issues

  • Not very tech savvy.
  • and when he did they were vague and confusing
  • Blamed me for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across several years with a and detailed anecdotes.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL2019 reviews
ENG2016 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values