AI Rate Professor

Computer & Informational Tech.

Rick White

CSIT123 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want purposeful AI learning and respect a leadership style; skip if you are strongly anti-AI.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLeadership-focusedAI-forwardRespectedClear gradingPolarizing on AI
  • Two glowing 5-star reviews praise leadership, ethics, and structure; .
  • Grades reported are A- and A+ among completers; .
  • Course centers real-world AI with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Completers report A-/A+ with moderate demand, but one student dropped before starting over AI requirements.

Online shows both high praise with A- and a drop; in-person reports easy A+ with difficulty 1.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings span 1 to 4; content is conceptual AI ethics and applications rather than pure fluff.

In-person felt easy (difficulty 1); online difficulty ratings were higher (3-4).

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Two of ; only the .

Online evidence is mixed (yes and no); the as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two of ; the third dropped and warns anti-AI students away.

Both formats include strong yes votes; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and A-/A+ among completers suggest fair-to-lenient grading when work is done.

Format shift

Completer grades are strong in both formats; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Does not over-demand per fans, but online difficulty 4 and syllabus AI work keep load from feeling featherlight.

Format shift

In-person difficulty 1 contrasts with online difficulty 3-4.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Fans praise leadership, structure, ethics, and inspiration; one online student felt the AI focus made the class unusable.

Format shift

In-person praise is unanimous; online is split between adoration and drop.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Comments emphasize structure, feedback, and .

Format shift

; evidence is assignment and syllabus driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person section described as insightful, well-structured, and strong on ethical AI with real-world balance.

Main concern

, so experience may not generalize.

What students said

“If you want to learn AI responsibly, this is the class for you!”
CSIT123

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online CSIT123 splits hard: one student calls him dictionary-definition leadership with ; another dropped over required AI/ChatGPT use.

Main concern

Syllabus-required AI tools turn off students who want an AI-free intro class.

What students said

“You can find a picture of Mr. White in Webster's dictionary next to the word "leadership"”
CSIT123
“ if you're anti-AI”
CSIT123

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Little exam detail in reviews

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You can find a picture of Mr. White in Webster's dictionary next to the word "leadership"”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in person), highlighting leadership praise versus AI-policy friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

👑 Leadership & Respect

78/100

“Mr. White of 2 professors (out of 36) I respect and gained from”

🤖 AI-Centered Curriculum

40/100

“Rick uses AI and machine learning in his CSIT 123 class, it's even required for some assignments”

🧭 Ethical AI Teaching

85/100

“He balances real-world AI applications with ethical discussions”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • insightful instructor who encourages students to understand themselves
  • class is well-structured, engaging, and thought-provoking
  • I wish I could take his classes for 4 years

Theme 2

🤖 About AI Focus

  • if you're anti-AI
  • He tells you not to trust it, while handing you links to ChatGPT
  • learn AI responsibly

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Demand

  • He does not over demand
  • A-
  • A+

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent reviews with vivid detail but polarized opinions and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CSIT1233 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1