AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nirmala Kashyap

MATH · MATH64 · MATH28 · MATH101 · MATH115 · MATH103 · MATH30 · MATH131 · MATH135 · MATH830 · MATH820 · MATH126 · MATH125 · MATH50 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
34.48%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and want a ; many students say teach yourself or switch.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyLots of homeworkThick accent barriersGraded by few things
  • Many students say recover or review mistakes.
  • but often low weight, and lectures feel fast or for many.
  • A sizable , and care, so experiences are sharply split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

As happen, but , and low homework weight mean an A usually takes serious effort.

Both formats describe hard work for grades; older online math 115 comments are somewhat friendlier.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Even lower-level , and heavier than expected for many students.

In-person difficulty complaints dominate; some online sections felt more manageable with practice tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and skip-class warnings appear often.

; online also often lists attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and many recent reviews urge avoiding her despite a cluster of strong fans.

; online is mixed with both high praise and harsh criticism.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

and ; tests are graded hard on work shown.

Format shift

; online has some fair/practice-test praise.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework and long packets are common, often for .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

; many say she is hard to understand, impatient, or does not truly teach.

Format shift

; online quality is mixed by era and course.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

recovery, while but low impact.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call her thorough and fair, while many report accent , and .

Main concern

and communication friction.

What students said

“If .”
MATH126
“Got an A but had to work hard for it.”
MATH126
“ . She's unclear with instructions, impatient, and ”
MATH

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and practice tests to MyMathLab-heavy courses with little teaching and delayed grades.

Main concern

Limited live teaching help and heavy online platforms when support is weak.

What students said

“She is damn good at replying to emails.”
MATH115
“She does not teach. She assigns all assignments, quizzes, midterms on MyMathLab.”
MATH131
“ online.”
MATH126

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

strict work requirements and limited makeups.

Test heavyHarder than homeworkShow all workLittle or no curve

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

show-work grading, often harder than HW and with .

Hard testsShow all workNo curve or dropsTest heavy
“ and practice tests.”
MATH115
“ HW. Have to show all work.”
MATH115

Online

Online sections use MyMathLab or campus tests/practice tests; reviews do .

MyMathLab quizzes and midtermsPractice testsCampus tests in some online courses
“She assigns all assignments, quizzes, midterms on MyMathLab.”
MATH131
“ . If you can do her practice test without any help you .”
MATH115

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If . She is without a doubt the worst teacher Ive ever had in all my years of school.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math reviews (6 online, 44 in person), highlighting split teaching and strict testing themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She DOES NOT teach you!!! She gets answers wrong. Overcomplicates everything.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

34/100

“ .”

⚖️

26/100

“your grade depends entirely on a few tests. There are no .”

📚 Workload Pain

28/100

“The homework packets take roughly 10 hours to complete and theyre worth 10 points”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She explained concepts by breaking down in smaller pieces.
  • English is not her first language and she is not fluent so communication can be tough.
  • . Writes a problem. You barely have enough time to copy it down

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want an easy A .
  • .
  • Got an A but had to work hard for it.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares about her students.
  • She is impatient, unfair
  • but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years and courses provide rich detail; opinions conflict but sample size is strong.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 59
3 out of 53
2 out of 513
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH1268 reviews
MATH1156 reviews
MATH1015 reviews
MATH645 reviews
MATH304 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH3 reviews
MATH1033 reviews
MATH1313 reviews
MATH8303 reviews
1262 reviews
MATH502 reviews
MATH8202 reviews
1351 review
MATH1251 review
MATH1351 review
MATH281 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

6

B 5 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1