AI Rate Professor

Media Arts & Technologies

Naagen Silven

ART101 · AAD75 · MAT110 · ART244 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
78.57%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her if you want real Photoshop skill and , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed feedbackCaring mentorNitpicky graderPhotoshop expertPractice intensive
  • Most students praise deep Photoshop skill, patience, and
  • You must practice many hours weekly; lazy work gets zeros
  • A vocal minority calls her unfair and overly nitpicky, especially in some online terms

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are common for diligent students, but and heavy weekly practice.

Online reviews more often mention zeros and unfairness; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Photoshop processes and and easy to forget without constant practice.

Both formats call the skill hard; online adds reading and video load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

late work often disallowed.

In-person emphasizes class presence; online still has strict weekly releases and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

79/100

About four in and care, despite tough grading complaints.

In-person love is steadier; online has a sharper split of 5s versus 1s.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

40/100

Detail-focused and sometimes zero-for-missed-requirement; supporters call it fair training, critics call it nitpicky.

Format shift

Online negative cluster is louder on zeros; in-person more often says fair but tough.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Weekly exercises, projects, and multi-hour practice are normal; not a wing-it class.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy practice; online adds more videos and reading for some terms.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

Deep tool knowledge, patient help, humor, and .

Format shift

In-person energy is especially praised; some online terms criticize lecture quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grade is driven by exercises, projects, and .

Format shift

; core still is project and exercise work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

expert who pushes hard and builds real skill.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ , and .”
MAT110
“She is extremely nit-picky. won't hesitate to give zeros”
MAT110
“If you come to this class, be ready to push yourself.”
ART244

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online MAT110 works well for motivated students who email and use Zoom help; weaker students report zeros and unhelpful lectures.

Main concern

Unforgiving exercise zeros and rigid weekly release timing for some online cohorts.

What students said

“She is a fun person and . .”
MAT110
“Her exercises are unforgiving and will easily give you a 0/20 even though you completed it.”
MAT110
“ and DONT wait till the .”
MAT110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly project and exercise based with occasional quizzes; friendliness depends on following specs exactly.

Weekly exercisesProjectsQuizzes in some termsDetail grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exercises with fair but tough assessments and lots of help; closed-book proctoring is not clearly proven.

ProjectsExercisesActionable feedbackDeadline firmness
“ but her assessments were always fair & provided .”
MAT110
“This class had a lot of fun assignments and was pretty easy to pass.”
MAT110

Online

Online evidence centers on weekly exercises, some quizzes, and harsh zeros when specs are missed; .

Weekly exercisesQuizzesDetail zerosZoom help available
“I never received full points on any of the .”
MAT110
“Tough grader but also a and .”
MAT110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Her teaching method gives you easy-to-follow, structured instructions to build your problem-solving confidence.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews across online and in-person MAT and art courses. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She goes out of her way to help you learn.”

👍

79/100

“ !!”

🔍 Nitpicky Grades

40/100

“Being super nit-picky at every detail possible.”

⏱️ Heavy Practice

34/100

“if you don't have time to practice at least 4-5 hrs a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • My Photoshop prof is fantastic! Highly knowledgeable and responsive
  • She teaches you to notice subtle differences in image qualities.
  • and adds humor.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely cares about her students and their success
  • .
  • She is very sweet and patient.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • she won't hesitate to give zeros even when you tried hard on an assignment.
  • Just an overall way too hard teacher.
  • she has no creative, she only teach you what is in the book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine reviews over many years with strong majority themes and a .

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MAT11034 reviews
ART2443 reviews
AAD751 review
ART1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

17

A 17

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1