AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jahna Ashlyn

PSYC101 · PSYC104 · PSYCH101 · PSYC115 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
26.67%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if ; do not expect strong live teaching or reliable communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture heavy and off-topicTeach yourself from the textbookCurves and drops low scoresUnresponsive communicationTests mismatch lectures
  • Many students say lectures waste time or .
  • Reading the textbook and .
  • Curves, dropped low scores, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, and dropped low scores help, but exams can be hard and .

Online and and online assessments; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content volume is high and quizzes are easy.

Some online students call it easy; lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional in others, with several students succeeding after skipping.

In-person attendance reports are mixed; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Low take-again , and communication problems despite some fair grading.

Negative tone is strong in both formats, with online also criticized for ghosting.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, and book-allowed online quizzes soften otherwise hard assessments.

Format shift

Curve and .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

, and multiple tests create steady work even when lectures feel empty.

Format shift

Lots of homework and and in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students repeatedly say lectures wander, tests diverge from class, and support is limited.

Format shift

In-person complaints focus on tangents; online complaints focus on absence and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes and exams dominate, with limited structured classwork beyond lectures and reading.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize online quizzes and exams over projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person she often lectures for long stretches that feel unrelated to tests, pushing students to the textbook.

Main concern

Lecture content .

What students said

“Everything she taught was completely different then what was on the test.”
PSYCH101
“I had to teach everything to myself. I only went to the class twice the whole semester.”
PSYC101
“ and , so you can use your book and you'll defs pass the class!”
PSYC115

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and weak communication.

Main concern

Long periods of silence or .

What students said

“She ghosted the entire class for the majority of the semester: 2 months.”
PSYC115
“class is very easy but lectures quite don't make sense to me.”
PSYC104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many assessments are online and book-friendly, with .

Online quizzesOpen book allowedDropped low scoresCurve

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person classes still use online quizzes and or dropped lows.

Online exams and quizzesUse your bookDrops lowest scoresCurve
“ and , so you can use your book and you'll defs pass the class!”
PSYC115
“ but . She also curves by 5%.”
PSYC101

Online

Online evidence points to long lecture videos and easy overall .

Online quizzesLong lecture videos
“average 60 min to 120 min per video. class is very easy but lectures quite don't make sense to me.”
PSYC104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I had to teach everything to myself. I only went to the class twice the whole semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grade softeners. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She spends too much time on unrelated stories and inappropriate jokes, and little focus on lessons.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“I strongly suggest not taking her class.”

📖

48/100

“Most of the learning comes from the textbook, and quizzes and so you can use them.”

⚖️ Grade Softeners

70/100

“I had a B/C in the semester but I ended with an A because she takes out a few of and tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was a horrible teacher and constantly wasted time in class instead of teaching
  • Long, boring lectures that stray from the point and don't teach much.
  • She was super unresponsive to emails and really harsh on giving help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class was very easy but not very engaging.
  • and if you can't read and memorize everything you still may get a pretty high grade because .
  • The was a 73% because of her sub optimal teaching skills.

Theme 3

💻 About Independence

  • Good class if you want independence.
  • and taking online quizzes every week.
  • You are basically teaching yourself via textbook.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

15 reviews are mixed but consistently critical of teaching quality, with and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYC1016 reviews
PSYC1044 reviews
PSYC1153 reviews
PSYCH1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1