AI Rate Professor

Physics

Shiqi Li

PHYS111 · PHYSICS111 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

unless you can teach yourself physics and handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesReads from textbookTough graderTest heavyPoor online structure
  • Most students say lectures restate the book with little problem-solving help.
  • and grades.
  • One online student found the class easy and caring, but the majority urge avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough-grader and test-heavy tags dominate, and students say hard work alone does not secure a decent grade.

Both online and ; only one online student called the class easy.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

and test weight make the course feel hard for most reviewers.

Online majority report high difficulty; one online review called it easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

participation expected.

and in-person reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and use strong stay-away language, despite one positive online review.

Online reviews are mixed one-to-three; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and comments that hard work does not earn a fair grade dominate the record.

Format shift

and in-person comments; one online student still felt cared for.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Test-heavy, lecture-heavy, and feel substantial.

Format shift

Online and and test weight.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students say she is smart but lectures transfer the .

Format shift

Teaching criticism is strongest online and ; one online outlier praised her.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test heavy and supportive assignment coaching.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person comments call teaching weak despite knowledge, with and students told not to rely on the textbook.

Main concern

Confusing teaching style and .

What students said

“ and he hasn't taken college physics in 50 years.”
PHYS111
“She will go over what is in the textbook but tell students to not rely on the textbook for equations and solutions.”
PHYS111

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online PHYS111 is mostly panned for , and little problem help, with one positive outlier.

Main concern

, and tough unsupportive grading for many students.

What students said

“ her class. She constantly changed the online schedule.”
PHYS111
“Her lectures consisted of and giving 0 explanation on how to solve any problems.”
PHYS111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not prove proctoring software, but .

Test heavyTough gradingLecture heavyTextbook dependent

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tough, with lectures that do not teach problem solving well.

Test heavyTough graderLecture heavy
“ ”
PHYS111
“If I could, I would ask for my money back.”
PHYS111

Online

Online reviews emphasize tests, tough grading, and poor .

Test heavyTough graderSchedule changes
“I thought if I worked hard enough I'd earn a decent grade, it's not the case with her.”
PHYSICS111
“Writes formulas with .”
PHYS111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ her class. She constantly changed the online schedule.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews with majority negative themes and one positive online outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I'm sure she is knowledgeable in physics but she should NOT teach.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ if you want to learn, find a prof who will help you succeed.”

📚 Lecture Style

15/100

“Her lectures consisted of and giving 0 explanation on how to solve any problems.”

⚖️

22/100

“I thought if I worked hard enough I'd earn a decent grade, it's not the case with her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She just seemed lost all the time

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I thought if I worked hard enough I'd earn a decent grade, it's not the case with her.
  • The class was easy! Just pay attention and study the materials.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Logistics

  • She constantly changed the online schedule.
  • She had a poor schedule and never knew what she was talking about.
  • She also stated to find other sources to teach us material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with vivid detail and mostly consistent complaints, but small sample, sparse grades, and one conflicting positive review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHYS1115 reviews
PHYSICS1111 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 5