AI Rate Professor

Communication

Crystal Sandoval

COMM106 · COMM220 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

With only two negative online reviews treat as high risk for and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderUnclear FeedbackQuiz HeavyVague ProjectsPoor Communication
  • Only two online reviews both rate quality low and flag .
  • Weekly multi-quiz load and vague group-project rules frustrate students.
  • Grades can still be A or B+ but students feel docked for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Students earned A and B+ but describe point docking and a rare .

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is not framed as brain-burning but and .

Evidence comes only from online COMM courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

as .

Only online evidence exists; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Neither reviewer would endorse the experience and quality scores are 1-2 with .

Recommendation signal is entirely from two online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough-grader tags and claims of reviews.

Format shift

Online-only evidence; no in-person contrast.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Three to four quizzes per week plus group projects and .

Format shift

Workload complaints are online-only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students say feedback and and communication about improvement is weak.

Format shift

Based solely on two online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Weekly quizzes group projects and graded work drive the .

Format shift

Online-only assessment picture.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Both online and vague group requirements.

Main concern

and hypocritical point .

What students said

“Ironically, this professor can't communicate well with her students and critique.”
COMM106
“She was not clear with so I could improve, and not clear with instructions on the second half of the course.”
COMM220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on many weekly quizzes and projects with strict scoring rather than clearly student-friendly exams.

Frequent QuizzesGroup ProjectsTough Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews highlight 3-4 quizzes weekly vague group rules and unclear later-course instructions.

3-4 Quizzes Per WeekGroup ProjectsUnclear Feedback
“Every week there's 3-4 quizzes, her requirements for and .”
COMM106
“This is the first C I've ever gotten in my academic career, a communication class with a poor grade”
COMM220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ironically, this professor can't communicate well with her students and critique.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews only; . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She was not clear with so I could improve”

⚖️

28/100

“ , and she finds ways to not give you 100%”

📝 Quiz Load

35/100

“Every week there's 3-4 quizzes, her requirements for ”

Theme 1

💬

  • can't communicate well with her students and critique

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Work

  • 3-4 quizzes
  • finds ways to not give you 100%
  • first C I've ever gotten

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two online reviews with limited time span and no in-person sample keep credibility low despite detailed complaints.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMM1061 review
COMM2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values