AI Rate Professor

English

Sonia Gutierrez

LIT120 · ENG201 · ENGL100 · ENG202 · ENG100 · ENGL202 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
68.42%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and are open to social-justice writing themes; expect essays and follow peers when instructions feel vague.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring Writing MentorStrong FeedbackRace and Culture FocusUnclear Instructions RiskEssay Heavy
  • Many students feel supported and improve as .
  • Course often centers race, culture, and identity themes that some love and others dislike.
  • Organization and online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are common if and participate, but and high page counts mean real writing effort.

Online and ; neither is a pure free A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Content difficulty is moderate English composition, with .

; in-person stresses show-up and essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass, especially in person.

; some online sections allow more flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and growth, with a vocal minority rejecting organization or politics.

Recommendations and course themes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Detailed feedback helps revision, but some call her a .

Format shift

and .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Multiple essays, discussions, and overwhelming.

Format shift

Some online ENG201 reviews report high page counts and lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Warm mentor who boosts writer confidence; organization and clarity are uneven.

Format shift

In-person warmth is praised; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

discussions and peer review supporting them.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Warm classroom presence and ; attendance and engagement matter and organization still varies.

Main concern

and peer-review heavy weeks can feel like wasted time to some.

What students said

“She really shows she cares for her students and was always there to help out.”
ENG100
“SO CONFUSING. She's nice, and easy to get along with but not a good professor.”
ENG100
“If .”
ENGL202

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and ; Canvas confusion and ideological mismatch drive low ratings for others.

Main concern

and polarized reactions to race and sexuality content.

What students said

“She's an amazing professor who cares deeply about her students improving their writting skills.”
ENGL202
“ALL of .”
LIT120
“ .”
ENG201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and discussions; reviews do not clearly describe strict proctored exams.

Essay FocusedDiscussion PostsPeer ReviewLimited Exam Mentions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Essays dominate; and participation matter more than formal exams.

Essay HeavyPeer ReviewAttendance Matters
“The majority of your grade (65%) are your essays, so make sure they are well-done!”
ENGL202

Online

Online work is mostly discussions and essays; .

Discussion PostsEssays
“We had lots of and do. 3 essays .”
ENGL202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Most english teachers made me feel stupid or incapable she really made be feel capable and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting care, essay load, and clarity splits. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Student Care

80/100

“She genuinely cares about each and every one of her students”

📝

78/100

“Your work will be graded fast, and but after a while, you get used to it”

⚠️ Clarity Issues

35/100

“ALL of .”

👍 Split Recommendation

68/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a published author and extremely respected.
  • She would leave thank you messages and
  • She's nice, and easy to get along with but not a good professor.

Theme 2

📚 About Themes & Content

  • Her class mainly revolves around race and culture
  • she talks about race and sexuality a lot
  • Some might not like her super liberal lessons

Theme 3

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • There's a lot of homework and a high page count requirement
  • As long as you turn in assignments and participate, you'll earn an A.
  • There are 4 essays and a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews with but smaller sample and polarized views on politics and organization.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
ENG2014 reviews
ENGL2024 reviews
ENG2023 reviews
ENGL1002 reviews
Show 1 more courses
LIT1202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values