AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Garrett Miller

PHIL101 · 102B · PHIL102 · PHIL100 · PHIL221 · 85 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you like laid-back philosophy and ; skip if you need highly structured lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHilarious LecturerLaid-Back StyleReading EssentialStudy Guides for ExamsTangent-Heavy Discussions
  • Many students love his humor and ; others find lectures bland or confusing.
  • Workload is light with few papers and exams, but .
  • easy A with notes vs. hard-to-follow exams and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many report easy A with reading and notes, but others say they worked hard or .

Online open-book style helps; and hard-earned A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Philosophy concepts and truth tables challenge beginners; .

Online self-teaching can feel harder; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Often not strictly mandatory, but skipping makes tangents and .

In-person notes warn against complacency; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Solid majority recommend him for humor and teaching clarity.

Recent online reviews lean positive; 2018 in-person cluster is more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Frequently called easy grader with high class averages and , though .

Format shift

; tough-grader tags appear in a minority of older reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Typically and final; weekly load stays manageable if .

Format shift

Both formats stress graded-by-few-things; online is more reading and discussion boards.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Entertaining, passionate, and discussion-friendly for many; others find lectures bland, tangent-heavy, or .

Format shift

In-person shows the strongest split; online quality depends on student self-direction.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Midterm and and quizzes.

Format shift

Online is test and reading heavy; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person is entertaining and discussion-heavy with few graded items, study guides, and , but a vocal minority call lectures and .

Main concern

Polarized views on lecture clarity and ; .

What students said

“Hes an entertaining lecturer. !”
PHIL221
“The midterm and because he words EVERY question in such a way that .”
PHIL101
“This was my easiest class... Super nice”
PHIL102

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online relies heavily on textbook reading, quizzes, tests, and discussions; some love flexibility while .

Main concern

Limited live teaching and .

What students said

“DO THE READING! If you read, you will pass. Have the .”
PHIL100
“there was no zooms and the professor didn't teach anything. the ”
PHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams dominate the grade with study guides; friendliness varies .

Midterm and Final HeavyStudy GuidesOpen Book Quizzes SometimesConfusing Wording Reports

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals come with study guides but some students say .

Study GuidesMidterm and FinalNo Note Card Sometimes
“He gives study guides for midterm and final.”
PHIL221
“I sat for a week memorizing his study guide for the final and NONE of it was on there.”
PHIL101

Online

Online tests often reward reading and can be open-book; .

Open Book During TestsReading EssentialQuizzes and Tests
“Have the .”
PHIL100
“Professor Miller doesn't grade super quickly either so .”
PHIL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Idk what people under me is talking about. This was my easiest class... .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (7 online, 43 in person), balancing praise for humor with critiques of clarity. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Professor Miller is very entertaining during lectures.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ ”

📖 Reading Required

75/100

“DO THE READING! If you read, you will pass.”

⚖️

40/100

“ . but the amount of stuff he wants you to remember is REDICULOUS!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • most relaxed professor I've ever had
  • hilarious and is beyond open to class discussion
  • lectures are a bit bland and hard to engage with

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A. Only 2 tests and 2 papers.
  • I worked hard for this A
  • , and hes a .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Workload is light (some journals and )

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

85

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years with detailed pro and con themes; opinions diverge but sample size and consistency within camps are strong.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 552
4 out of 517
3 out of 57
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHIL10019 reviews
PHIL10117 reviews
PHIL10210 reviews
PHIL2213 reviews
102B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 9 · A 20

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4