AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zahedani Heyder

MATH131 · MATH260 · MATH150 · MATH30 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Work the homework and in person and he can be fair, but expect , and uneven lecture clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit heavyTest and quiz focusedMixed lecture clarityLots of homeworkAccent adjustment needed
  • and doable grades.
  • One strong online or lecture complaint cites fast pace, missing notes, and accent barriers.
  • , but and dropped scores can cushion grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

and dropped quizzes help, but grades still and studying exam problems carefully.

; the Online review ended in .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content ranges from straightforward lower math to calc-level courses students call simple yet test-heavy and homework-dense.

In-person reviews lean manageable; Online review describes very hard pacing.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

64/100

Attendance is often not strictly mandatory when lectures are recorded, but students and learning much easier.

In-person advice is to attend; yet notes were not posted.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and fairness, tempered by tough lectures and one harsh non-recommend.

; the single Online review strongly does not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and lots of coexist with tough-grader tags and test-heavy scoring.

Format shift

In-person comments split between forgiving and tough; Online tags him tough.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and textbook work show up repeatedly.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy homework or and precalc notes.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and caring, while others say he is boring, fast, or hard to understand at first.

Format shift

In-person is mixed-positive; Online is strongly negative on clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple exams and quizzes dominate, supported by homework and .

Format shift

and quizzes most clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, forgiving drops, and a path to solid grades if you do the work.

Main concern

Lots of homework, test-heavy structure, and .

What students said

“Really great course material, if you do the work you will get a good grade.”
MATH260
“No trick questions or surprises and he gives a lot of opportunities.”
MATH131

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single Online review is strongly negative, citing fast whiteboard lectures, thick accent, no posted notes, and a .

Main concern

Missing lecture notes online and a pace that leaves students behind.

What students said

“ . lectures memorized so he just stands at the whiteboard and writes.”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Expect several exams and quizzes with practice materials and , but not a .

Multiple examsQuizzes and pop quizzesPractice testsExtra credit before tests

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report three exams, four quizzes, practice tests, and .

3 exams4 quizzesPractice testsDrop a quiz and exam
“The class has 3 exams, 4 quizzes, easy hw assignments (6 per section).”
MATH260
“ and an exam and there are several opportunities.”
MATH260

Online

The Online review does not clearly document exam format beyond a tough, lecture-heavy experience.

“goes super fast and doesn't give the class enough time to understand the problems.”
MATH150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard to fail & easiest prof for calc3/de at mcc”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews with one Online and five In person math sections. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ , and overall a great instructor.”

⚠️ Lecture Friction

35/100

“He has a thick accent which can be difficult for some to understand.”

📝 Path

75/100

“Offers a lot of especially before a test.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do the work you will get a good grade
  • Hard to fail & easiest prof for calc3/de at mcc
  • Do the extras and study every single problem he gives you

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and he provides lots of examples
  • Boring but simple class
  • His accent does make a little hard to understand AT FIRST

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • He assigns lots of
  • easy hw assignments (6 per section)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across several years with mixed quality scores and one highly polarized Online outlier keep reliability moderate.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1502 reviews
MATH2602 reviews
MATH1311 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1