AI Rate Professor

History

Gwendollyn Ulrich-Schuebohm

HIST101 · HIST110 · HIST206 · HIST1449 · HIST111 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless , and can handle delayed grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOff-Topic PoliticsSlow GraderHeavy ReadingUnclear InstructionsPolarizing History
  • Many students say class time drifts into personal politics instead of history content.
  • , so you may not know your standing for months.
  • A minority praise passion, free materials, and when they stay engaged.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Some As appear when students participate and do all reading, but and heavy writing make an easy A unreliable.

Older in-person reviews sound more A-friendly; recent online and and harsh.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Lots of reading, papers, and expected background knowledge make the course feel harder than a standard survey class.

; online adds weekly workload pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and as crucial to passing.

; online still expects presence and weekly work.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

, and recent comments urge students to find another professor.

Online summer praise exists, but overall and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and late or missing grades leave students uncertain and stressed.

Format shift

Online and older positive notes.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and participation add up quickly.

Format shift

Online weekly load is explicit; and in-class assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Passion and subject knowledge appear, but confusion, side-tracks, and .

Format shift

A few online summer students loved her; many in-person students found lectures off-topic.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Participation, reading, papers, and .

Format shift

; online leans weekly assignments and writing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person lectures often run long on current events or personal views, with and .

Main concern

Side-tracked lectures and poor grade updates make the class feel disorganized.

What students said

“She waited to grade after the . I had no idea what grade I was sitting at.”
HIST111
“Will literally spend 3/4th of class preaching about her personal life or her politics.”
HIST110
“If you show up to class and do the A.”
HIST111

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online history sections demand weekly work and lots of and mixed clarity.

Main concern

and grades that appear only near the end of term.

What students said

“ and might give you incorrect information. HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU FIND ANOTHER PROFESSOR!!!”
HIST111
“You won't know what grade you're sitting at until the semester is .”
HIST101
“She is super passionate and offers tons of .”
HIST111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers, reading, and participation more than a , so .

Participation PointsPapers and ReadingDelayed Grade FeedbackExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments; one review says a final was not graded on time.

Participation PointsIn-Class AssignmentsFinal Exam MentionedLate Grading
“A lot of the and assignments she gives in class.”
HIST111
“She didn't even grade some of .”
HIST111

Online

Online reviews mention heavy weekly work and delayed grades; one positive review notes no multiple choice and lots of reading or writing.

Lots of ReadingWriting HeavyNo Multiple Choice MentionedExtra Credit
“there is a lot of reading and writing, no MC.”
HIST111
“This class requires a lot of work weekly !”
HIST101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 , and polarization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“ and might give you incorrect information.”

⏳

25/100

“She waited to grade after the . I had no idea what grade I was sitting at.”

📢 Off-Topic Lectures

30/100

“Will literally spend 3/4th of class preaching about her personal life or her politics.”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“I love Professor Ulrich-Schlumbohm. She is so sweet and kind. She genuinley wants all her students to sucseed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will spend the whole time just talking about stuff that do not go with the subject
  • She is a very strict professor & is very knowledgeable in her subject.
  • She was awesome. ... She is demanding, but I feel like I am truly ready for a university.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You won't know what grade you're sitting at until the semester is almost over
  • Dont expect to get an a w/o working
  • If you show up to class and do the A.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Get ready to read
  • This class requires a lot of work weekly !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews span many years with detailed complaints, but the sample is smaller and somewhat polarized, so confidence is medium.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HIST1119 reviews
HIST1012 reviews
HIST1101 review
HIST14491 review
HIST2061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values