AI Rate Professor

Art

Clayton Llewellyn

ART101 · ART203 · ART102 · ART100 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Great fun for in-person studio art if you value vibe and effort, but expect and avoid if you need tight online structure.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious Studio EnergyEffort Over TalentSlow GraderLaid BackMusic and Stories
  • , and effort-based with strong personality praise
  • Recent Online and some ART100 , and poor responsiveness
  • You do not need prior art talent, but delays and light structure frustrate deadline-focused students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Grades reward effort and participation more than raw talent, and many report A or A+ outcomes.

Online and In person both report high grades, but Online success still came with frustration about delays.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Intro art stays approachable, though .

In person studio feels fun and manageable; Online felt easy on content but poorly run.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Most reviews that and skipping hurts.

Both Online and In .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Strong older studio love is pulled down by recent Online disorganization and .

In person reviews are mostly enthusiastic; Online reviews are disappointed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Effort and participation drive grades, though a few call him a and .

Format shift

In person is more encouraging; and tougher feel.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Projects and , but there is little textbook busywork.

Format shift

Online had gaps with missing assignments; In person had steady studio work.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

In-person students find him hilarious and inspiring, while recent Online and a few ART100 reviews cite disorganization.

Format shift

In person teaching vibe is strong; Online delivery is weak.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

True across Online and In person art courses reviewed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students love his humor, music, encouragement, and .

Main concern

Some want more hands-on technical coaching and note that .

What students said

“Its hard to not laugh or grin in this class. Enjoyable class and the professor is a real gem.”
ART203
“lots of music and story time :) - but I learned a lot from him!”
ART102
“Don't need to be great at art to pass, he looks for effort and participation.”
ART100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Recent Online ART100 students report Canvas problems, missing assignments, and .

Main concern

Slow responses and .

What students said

“We went two weeks with no assignments. We were unable to get ahold of him”
ART100
“a drawing I submitted didn't get graded until more than a month later.”
ART100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses are graded on art projects and effort, not proctored exams.

Project BasedEffort FocusedNo Traditional Exams Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critique based with effort weighted over talent; no closed-book exam policy is described.

Studio ProjectsEffort and ParticipationCritique Feedback
“Don't need to be great at art to pass, he looks for effort and participation.”
ART100
“ but never cuts students down with negative comments.”
ART102

Online

Online ART100 used submitted drawings and assignments with , but .

Submitted DrawingsDelayed GradingCanvas Issues
“a drawing I submitted didn't get graded until more than a month later.”
ART100
“He had some issues with Canvas, so he could not assign stuff.”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Enjoyable class and the professor is a real gem.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (2 Online, 12 In person), contrasting fun studio energy with . Credibility rating: Medium.

😂 Studio Personality

74/100

“Its hard to not laugh or grin in this class. Enjoyable class and the professor is a real gem.”

🐢 Online Delay Risk

40/100

“a drawing I submitted didn't get graded until more than a month later.”

🎨 Effort Over Talent

80/100

“Don't need to be great at art to pass, he looks for effort and participation.”

👍 Split Recommendation

66/100

“If you don't mind the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lots of music and story time
  • Super laid back and talented guy
  • hilarious, an amazing artist and a great teacher

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization

  • We went two weeks with no assignments

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I LOVE CLAYTON <3 he's the
  • Such a and easygoing
  • a real gem

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews over many years are informative, but Online is only 2 reviews and recent negatives contrast with older In person praise.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1008 reviews
ART1023 reviews
ART2032 reviews
ART1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values