AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Andre Andersen

CSIT105B · CSIT100 · CSIT105 · SP16CSIT1001968 · CSIT110 · CSIT137 · CSIT128 · 44 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
90.48%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you will do the weekly practice work; he is one of the strongest CSIT application instructors on campus.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaCaring and helpfulExcel and SimNet focusLots of homeworkStrong recommendations
  • , structured pacing, and strong email support.
  • Workload can be heavy especially online, but doing the practice work reliably yields high grades.
  • A few outliers cite communication issues, yet the large majority praise patience and career-useful skills.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many As reported when students complete practice and follow the syllabus; effort maps cleanly to grades.

Online easy A needs full practice load; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro computer apps and Excel are approachable, though formulas and later units can get harder without practice.

Online difficulty rises with volume of work; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and others no; many online formats rely on deadlines more than seats.

Online is more deadline-driven; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

Roughly 90% would take again with repeated praise for clarity, care, and real skill gains.

Strong recommendation holds online and in person; online has more workload caveats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

, and high A rates when work is completed.

Format shift

Online late work flexibility mentioned; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of and multi-hour weekly practice, especially for Excel and SimNet courses.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are louder; in-person often calls work straightforward if you keep up.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and highly applied computer instruction.

Format shift

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly glowing; online quality is still high with a few communication critiques.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and tests built from practiced skills.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignment practice; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students , and applied computer skills with mostly light-to-moderate difficulty.

Main concern

SimNet pickiness and occasional communication friction for a minority of students.

What students said

“Professor Andersen is a great professor. are clear and concise.”
CSIT110
“Makes class simple and go the point.”
CSIT128
“Professor Anderson is the . and helpful.”
CSIT110

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are structured and clear but ; success comes from steady practice and Sunday deadlines.

Main concern

Workload can feel ridiculous if you have kids or a full job, especially in summer.

What students said

“ and it's an easy A. Everything is due on Sundays which is a great change of pace too.”
CSIT128
“Hes cool and understanding but the work load is ridiculous.”
CSIT110
“ .”
CSIT137

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and apps tools; reviews do not show strict proctoring tools.

SimNet practice testsSkills-based examsClear syllabus deadlinesHomework-heavy prep

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and tests aligned with practiced computer skills.

Clear grading criteriaSkills practiceHelpful office support
“I feel this class has a and is structured very well.”
CSIT110
“The coursework was well laid out, well paced and very straightforward.”
CSIT128

Online

Online students say practice is required to do well on tests and assignments; due dates are listed clearly on the syllabus.

Practice-heavy testsSunday due datesSyllabus-driven schedule
“Towards the end I finally realized I had to do a lot of practice and assignments.”
CSIT128
“He is very clear with when all the the syllabus.”
CSIT128

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“do not hesitate, go ahead and enroll his class. You are gonna like it 100%.”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews, highlighting clear structure, care, and workload tradeoffs. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Professor Andersen is a great professor. are clear and concise.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

91/100

“He is !”

📗 Easy A Path

80/100

“ and it's an easy A.”

📦 Workload Reality

42/100

“Hes cool and understanding but the work load is ridiculous.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful
  • Makes class simple and go the point
  • awesome, helpful instructor, would recommend his CSIT 110 class !!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and it's an easy A
  • Great class, easy to pass - an overall great experience
  • There is a ton of work and you will want to do all of it if you want to get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He cares about his students and does everything he can to help
  • Mr. Andersen was very lenient with students having to transition to total online learning
  • He is a caring teacher and wants you to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

44

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

44 reviews spanning many years with strong consistency on clarity, care, and recommendation across online and in-person.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CSIT12814 reviews
CSIT10013 reviews
CSIT11011 reviews
CSIT1052 reviews
CSIT1372 reviews
Show 2 more courses
CSIT105B1 review
SP16CSIT10019681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 3 · A 12 · A- 4

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values