AI Rate Professor

English

Jayne Braman

ENGL50 · 1399ENG · ENGL100 · ENG100 · ENG50 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.41%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want real writing growth and ; skip if you want a low-effort free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorStrong draft feedbackStrict revision standardsParticipation-focusedNo textbook cost
  • Most students praise caring feedback that improves writing, especially when they use office hours and drafts.
  • A vocal minority calls her a and occasional AI accusations.
  • and participation matter; and revision chances.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn As through drafts, revisions, and late-work flexibility, but picky standards and rewrites mean an A still costs real effort.

Online reviews stress rewrite demands and ; in-person reviews more often link As and drafting support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard English composition with reading and but not lightweight either.

Both formats describe process-heavy writing; online difficulty centers on clarity of .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and stress participation and in-class writing support as keys to success.

In-person attendance is repeatedly treated as crucial; Not provided marks.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

About seven in and writing growth despite grading complaints.

Online recommendations are more split; in-person praise is stronger among students who engage in class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Late work and revisions can and rewrite demands keep grades from feeling free.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Expect weekly tasks and a .

Format shift

; in-person workload includes class participation and drafting.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most detailed reviews highlight caring, accessible feedback that improves writing, offset by some clarity and tone complaints.

Format shift

; online quality swings harder high and low.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades revolve around essays, weekly writing tasks, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-driven with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

coach with in-class drafting time, though some report unclear structure, over-critical grading for a 100-level course, or unprofessional moments.

Main concern

and a few reports of disrespectful classroom moments.

What students said

“She not only worked hard to help me improve my writing, she also worked with each person in the class.”
ENG100
“Her class was sloppily put together and no one in the class knew what we were doing.”
ENGL100
“There was a daily plan for in-class work and then she allowed us to do much of our writing in class.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are structured with weekly tasks, video lectures, and revision opportunities; and clear, while some find her stingy, passive-aggressive, and overly harsh on rewrites.

Main concern

Harsh rewrite cycles and AI accusations frustrate students who want clearer, more flexible expectations.

What students said

“Overall, very nice and genuinely wants and consistent.”
ENGL100
“She is the most stingy person ever, will make you rewrite something so many times if you don't write it exactly how she wants it.”
ENGL100
“She graded and so that we knew what to work on as the semester went on.”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and process writing; described.

Essay-based assessmentDraft and revision cyclesLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work emphasizes in-class drafting, participation, and essays; reviews do .

In-class writing timeParticipation mattersEssay feedback
“There was a daily plan for in-class work and then she allowed us to do much of our writing in class.”
ENG100
“She was willing to look over our work and .”
ENG100

Online

Online assessments center on weekly assignments and and revision chances.

Weekly writing tasksEssay process over weeksRevision opportunities
“The well on since the process was broken down over weeks.”
ENGL100
“She gave opportunities to revise papers, which helped me with my writing.”
ENG100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She not only worked hard to help me improve my writing, she also worked with each person in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews spanning online and in-person , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She stepped us through how to develop our ideas and overall made us better writers!”

📝

80/100

“She gave such constructive feedback for , and really helped me to improve my writing!”

⚖️

48/100

“she expects so much more than other professors who teach the same course, she grades very harshly it is very unfair and unnecessary.”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ hard time with English, but has the motivation to go to school every day.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Pretty thorough with lectures and reasonable expectations.
  • Prof. Braman is a caring professor.
  • , and is ALWAYS open to questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • will make you rewrite something so many times if you don't write it exactly how she wants it.
  • overly critical for a 100 level class
  • if you put in effort your good.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • You can tell she really cares about helping students.
  • Love, love, love this professor!
  • She is a kind and patient teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine detailed reviews span 2016-2026 with , and grading strictness across online and in-person formats.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGL10014 reviews
ENG10011 reviews
ENGL502 reviews
1399ENG1 review
ENG501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1