AI Rate Professor

Design

Maximo Escobedo

MAT155 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

, and frustrating feedback in MAT155.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderVague expectationsNo active teachingSlow rage gradingUnhelpful feedback
  • Students report almost no active teaching and vague assignment expectations.
  • harsh or unhelpful feedback.
  • Both online and in-person MAT155 reviews rate quality at 1/5.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and vague expectations make an A unreliable even when one student still reported one.

Online student earned a C; but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

High difficulty ratings and self-teaching demand make the course hard beyond content alone.

Both online and in-person reviews rate difficulty high (4-5).

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online listed attendance mandatory while .

; in-person review says not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Both reviews are 1/5 and describe disappointing teaching with .

Negative recommendation is consistent across online and in-person formats.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and unhelpful public feedback.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tough or .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Graded by few things, but formatting fights and .

Format shift

In-person tags note graded by few things; .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

No active teaching, vague expectations, and disappointing design instruction.

Format shift

Both online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and few graded items.

Format shift

Both reviews discuss assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MAT155 offers little teaching and vague expectations with .

Main concern

You essentially teach yourself typography despite taking the course.

What students said

“He has extremely vague expectations for assignments and does no active teaching.”
MAT155
“You will learn more about typography from other professors in the design field.”
MAT155

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MAT155 features months-long , and rigid formatting refusals.

Main concern

and complaints about workload create a hostile online experience.

What students said

“ and then rage grade the night before Thanksgiving.”
MAT155
“He will refuse to grade things if you are having trouble formatting.”
MAT155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and do not clearly document exam policy.

Assignment-heavyVague rubricsLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; focus is on vague assignment expectations.

Vague assignment expectationsFew graded items
“He has extremely vague expectations for assignments and does no active teaching.”
MAT155

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format; assessment .

Delayed gradingFormatting gates
“ and then rage grade the night before Thanksgiving.”
MAT155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the most disappointing professors I have had. He has extremely vague expectations for assignments and does no active teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting poor teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

12/100

“does no active teaching”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“One of the most disappointing professors I have had”

⚖️

18/100

“rage grade the night before Thanksgiving”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • does no active teaching
  • extremely vague expectations
  • You will learn more about typography from other professors

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • refuse to grade things if you are having trouble formatting
  • public (copy and pasted with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent 2023 reviews, but they are detailed and fully consistent in negativity.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MAT1552 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values