AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Cyndi McNeal

MAP50 · MAP100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage rigid formatting rules and get little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderNitpicky line countsNo late workUnresponsiveLots of papers
  • Most reviews are low quality with only about 17% willing to take her again
  • , and minor grammar nitpicks
  • Students report poor communication and rigid 8 pm deadlines

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students still pass, but , and nitpicking make an easy A unlikely.

Online reviews dominate the ; the one in-person review agrees on strict line rules.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not described as advanced, but rigid requirements and .

Online comments mention quizzes and papers; in-person evidence is sparse.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

as not mandatory.

Both formats that report attendance treat it as non-mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students would not take her and poor communication.

Negative recommendation is consistent across online and the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and line-count nitpicking dominate, with .

Format shift

; in-person echoes the same line-count rule.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report lots of , and rigid templates with no late submissions.

Format shift

and papers most clearly.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students call her unpleasant, unresponsive, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the bulk of teaching complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment , and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online comments detail quizzes and paper formatting; in-person only notes line counts.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review also notes strict line-count expectations and an unpleasant tone.

Main concern

, so format-specific confidence is limited.

What students said

“For your answers, she wants a certain amount of lines... She didn't seem very pleasant.”
MAP50

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MAP students describe tough, nitpicky grading, no late work, and .

Main concern

Unresponsive communication combined with rigid formatting and deadline rules.

What students said

“My biggest issue is that she wont answer emails, or .”
MAP50
“ almost absurd degree.”
MAP100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and written responses are common, with strict due times and format .

QuizzesAssignment templatesStrict deadlines

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The lone in-person review only notes strict line-length expectations for answers.

Line-count answers
“For your answers, she wants a certain amount of lines.”
MAP50

Online

Online students mention quiz questions not always covered and .

QuizzesNo late workLine-count grading
“The course material.”
MAP50
“Will not accept anything past her 8 pm deadline.”
MAP50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ almost absurd degree.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 mostly online reviews with . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️

15/100

“Grades answers based on number of lines instead of something useful and measurable, like word count.”

📵 Poor Communication

20/100

“I havent been able to communicate with her at all.”

👎 Low Recommendation

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • nitpicks to an almost absurd degree
  • Grades answers based on number of lines

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • Will not accept anything past her 8 pm deadline

Theme 3

😤 About Instructor Tone

  • She didn't seem very pleasant.
  • she doesnt seem pleasant either
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistent negative reviews from 2017-2023 form a , but the sample is small and mostly online.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MAP504 reviews
MAP1002 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values