AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Grace Gray-Adams

MULTI121 · ART248 · ART101 · ART247 · ART251 · ART100 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless and ignore most of the supply list.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoesn't TeachExpensive Unused SuppliesUnorganizedPersonal Life LecturesAvoid If Possible
  • Students widely report little real instruction and say they must teach themselves.
  • Expensive supply lists are common while only a fraction of items get used.
  • Many recent reviews urge taking a different professor despite occasional A grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students report A or A+ with late-work leniency, but others call her a tough or .

Both formats report occasional high grades, but evidence of easy A is stronger in a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Beginner courses still feel hard because technique is rarely taught step by step and .

In-person reviews stress missing instruction more; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and optional in others, with mixed enforcement.

In-person comments mention mandatory participation more often than online.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most recent students say choose another professor.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

or arbitrary final grades.

Format shift

In-person comments show more grade conflict; online .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Workload is not extreme, but supply costs and .

Format shift

; online pain is more about unclear weekly tasks.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many students say she talks about personal life, repeats herself, or .

Format shift

; online reviews emphasize absence and confusion.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Projects, quizzes, and exam prep.

Format shift

and ; online mentions weekly quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person classes often feel unorganized, lecture-heavy on personal life, and weak on technique teaching.

Main concern

Little skill instruction, expensive unused supplies, and uneven professionalism.

What students said

“ . She doesn't teach, she just recommends learning yourself and watching videos online.”
ART251
“Don't waste your time or money on this class. She doesn't teach art she just shows up for the pay check.”
ART101
“Just buy a drawing pad and some art pencils and ignore the rest of her list you won't need other than that.”
ART100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and light on real teaching.

Main concern

Vague or late instructions and almost no teaching presence.

What students said

“The online formatting for assignments and and hard to navigate.”
ART100
“This has been by far the . Does not grade in a timely manner, she doesn't teach anything.”
MULTI121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mostly standard project or quiz based rather than strictly proctored.

Group MidtermOnline FinalWeekly QuizzesLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one student notes group midterm and .

Group MidtermOnline FinalLate Work Allowed
“ and .”
ART100
“Allows late work will full credit, she genuinely wants everybody to pass in the class.”
ART100

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and .

Weekly QuizzesTextbook Based
“you just read the text book and use the textbook resources”
MULTI121
“she doesn't upload the ”
MULTI121

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She doesn't teach, she just recommends learning yourself and watching videos online.”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting weak teaching, supply cost, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She doesn't teach, she just recommends learning yourself and watching videos online.”

💸 Supply Waste

22/100

“she made us spend over 200 dollars in art supplies that we never used.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“Don't waste your time or money on this class. She doesn't teach art she just shows up for the pay check.”

🗂️ Organization

30/100

“ . Expensive supplies. Surprising amount of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she never showed us techniques or anything
  • two hours of her talking about her personal life and minimal actual teaching
  • She repeats everything MULTIPLE times.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she genuinely wants everybody to pass in the class
  • She is a if you optimize the files correctly
  • she'll find a way to give you a bad grade.

Theme 3

🛒 About Cost and Supplies

  • Just buy a drawing pad and some art pencils and ignore the rest of her list
  • you will only use about 1/4 of what she has listed
  • Expensive supplies.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews across many years with mixed eras reduce consistency, but and detailed.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ART1006 reviews
ART2475 reviews
ART1013 reviews
ART2482 reviews
ART2512 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MULTI1211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1