AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Farid Sadeghipour

MATH641872 · MATH64 · MATH103 · MATH30 · MATH102 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
65%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take him if and ; skip if you need a polished explainer every day.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized reviewsLots of homeworkExtra creditPop quizzesHelpful when you show up
  • , and fair while others say he is mid or a bad teacher.
  • , and matter more than flashy lectures for passing.
  • but and EC reward people who show up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students pass with C to A and practice tests, but an A still needs consistent effort and EC helps more than magic.

; in-person reviews show more C-range grades despite support.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Content is usually manageable developmental math, though some sections feel slow or harder than prior prep courses.

Online students often call it manageable; some in-person MATH64/MATH103 students still struggle.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Many sections treat class as optional but and .

Online optional-class comments are common; as important for EC.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but a loud minority warns students away over weak teaching.

; online has both strong love and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Partial credit, , and a desire for students to pass C or higher appear often, with .

Format shift

Online EC generosity is a repeated theme; and partial credit.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lots of and practice is the norm, though a few .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and humor for some students; , and arithmetic mistakes for others.

Format shift

Polarization appears in both formats, with recent online reviews especially split.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and pop quizzes plus projects appear in some sections.

Format shift

Online emphasizes HW-like tests; and occasional projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person math feels chill and often passable with homework and practice tests, but arithmetic errors and .

Main concern

, and polarized teaching quality make outcomes depend on self-study.

What students said

“Whoever says differently about this professor just didn't put the effort into the class. Love this man!”
MATH103
“He's just mid. Not the .”
MATH103
“He isn't super good at math. He makes a lot of errors and .”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online MATH sections range from love for optional class and easy and lackadaisical lectures.

Main concern

homework and others telling students not to take him.

What students said

“The , so as long as you do the hw you are set!”
MATH103
“Do yourself a favor and ”
MATH103
“Hes lackadaisical. The only thing good about his teaching technique is his EC generosity.”
MATH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually standard closed classroom math tests that .

Tests similar to homeworkPractice testsPop quizzesExtra creditPartial credit

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

EC, and standard exams with partial credit in some cases.

Practice testsPop quizzesPartial creditHomework-heavy prep
“This class is difinitely passable if you do the and study the .”
MATH103
“ answers on test”
MATH641872

Online

Online tests are described as homework-style problems with .

Homework-like testsExtra creditManageable if HW is done
“The , so as long as you do the hw you are set!”
MATH103
“Really easy xtra cred opportunities that allowed me to have over 100% in the class.”
MATH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Whoever says differently about this professor just didn't put the effort into the class. Love this man! I have struggled with math my whole life. and will help you to pass his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He's just mid. Not the .”

📝

70/100

“The , so as long as you do the hw you are set!”

⚠️ Polarized Reviews

40/100

“Do yourself a favor and ”

🎁 Help

75/100

“Really easy xtra cred opportunities that allowed me to have over 100% in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • examples
  • He makes a lot of errors and .
  • so hilarious, smart, flexible

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • his class isn't that hard
  • Hes easy but
  • u cannot fail.

Theme 3

📚

  • There is quite a bit of hw but if you separate it out, it is more than manageable.
  • Class was optional and you only went if you had questions.
  • he .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

25 reviews across many years with and exams, and consistent mixed themes.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 58
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH10312 reviews
MATH6418726 reviews
29222 reviews
MATH302 reviews
MATH642 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH1021 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

10

C+ 4 · C 6

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values