AI Rate Professor

Economics

Frederica Carr

ECON100 · ECONMAC · ECON102 · ECON120 · MACROECON · ECON · ECON101 · ECON100ONLINE · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid Frederica Carr for economics unless you already know the material and have no other option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesUnorganized EconAvoid If PossibleTangents Over TeachingTest-Heavy Confusion
  • , and among the worst econ instructors.
  • Course can still be passed, sometimes with , but learning and clarity are poor.
  • ; students urge peers to pick anyone else.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some students pass with A grades by self-studying or open-book work, but many report tough or and low success rates.

Online sometimes passable via book and quizzes; and harsh.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content feels hard mainly because and .

Both formats require heavy self-teaching; difficulty is amplified by poor delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory while others online or optional, but skipping rarely helps because .

In-person more often mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Take-again is about 14% and the dominant message is do not enroll if any alternative exists.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags, inconsistent scoring, and limited .

Format shift

A few online students still finish with A via volume of assignments; in-person feels harsher.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Many quizzes, tests, group projects, and the effort.

Format shift

Online piles quizzes, tests, and group work; in-person adds long lectures and homework.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students overwhelmingly say she cannot explain economics clearly and lectures confuse more than they help.

Format shift

Both formats are negative; rare older positive notes do not change the overall disaster tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, and some group or take-home elements.

Format shift

Online is quiz and test heavy; group final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and poorly explained, with inconsistent grading and low learning.

Main concern

, personal tangents, and .

What students said

“She is one of the often go off on crazy tangents”
ECON101
“ on the topic after the class.”
ECON101
“ !! This has by far been the most frustrating course I have ever taken.”
ECON101

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online econ is widely described as outdated, convoluted, poorly explained, and .

Main concern

Unclear schedules, useless or unused textbooks, and .

What students said

“Her class is outdated, poorly constructed, and has very little if you lose them.”
ECON101
“ you.”
MACROECON
“One of the .”
ECON100ONLINE

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and often hard or tricky, though .

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are often difficult and sometimes poorly worded; older .

Hard testsOpen notes sometimesGroup final or take-home
“ but she only takes 2/3, and one is a .”
ECON102
“ and group test,2 take homes,1 in class”
ECON101
“ and when you ask for help defining the question she offers little to no help.”
ECON101

Online

Online exams and , but material is poorly supported by lectures.

Open-book testsMany quizzesTest-heavy grading
“There was plenty of .”
ECON100ONLINE
“ . If you watch the lecture and do the required assignments, the .”
ECON100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews across online and in-person economics courses. Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“She is one of the often go off on crazy tangents that have nothing to do with the class”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“ !! This has by far been the most frustrating course I have ever taken.”

📚

32/100

“You will be completely responsible for learning everything from the book and on your own.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Teaching Quality

  • She can't teach at all
  • !

Theme 2

📝 About Course Design

  • The schedule was convoluted and overlapped
  • Her class is outdated, poorly constructed

Theme 3

📈

  • There was plenty of
  • she grades fairly so do the work and you will be fine

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews across years and formats are highly consistent in condemning teaching quality, with only sparse positives.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 510
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ECON10117 reviews
ECON1008 reviews
ECON100ONLINE4 reviews
MACROECON2 reviews
ECON1 review
Show 3 more courses
ECON1021 review
ECON1201 review
ECONMAC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1