AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Linda Haar

CHLD160 · CHLD140 · CHLD270 · CHLD250 · CHLD230 · CHLD109 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you need her specific section and can absorb heavy .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderOverwhelming workloadInflexible attendanceHarsh feedback toneHeavy volunteer hours
  • Majority of recent reviews rate quality 1-2 with
  • CHLD270 and similar , and
  • Older lighter CHLD109 notes exist but are outnumbered by stress and inflexibility complaints

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some As appear when rubrics are followed exactly, but , and volume make an A costly.

Online CHLD270 students report As and Bs with extreme effort; homework.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students call several courses the hardest they have taken with massive reading, papers, and unpaid volunteer load.

One early online CHLD109 called it easy; newer online practicum-style courses dominate as brain-burners.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and missing class can void homework credit due to missed discussion.

; in-person has the strongest penalty story.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and many students say they will never take her again despite a few older positives.

Online recent reviews are harsher; one older in-person CHLD270 student enjoyed her style.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader tags, word-for-word paper scrutiny, and .

Format shift

; in-person stresses attendance-linked zeros.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

99-plus volunteer hours, many papers, constant small assignments, and .

Format shift

Online CHLD270 is the peak overload; and projects.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

A minority find her knowledgeable and caring, but , and .

Format shift

In-person has one strong positive; online includes unprofessional Blackboard and email complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Papers, volunteer logs, quizzes, and exam structure.

Format shift

Online mentions hard finals and ; and final projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

—but several call her inflexible on attendance and confusing or rude.

Main concern

Attendance-linked grading and .

What students said

“ but I missed classes and it heavily impacted my grade.”
CHLD109
“ . I was disappointed.”
CHLD160

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews focus on , and hard exams.

Main concern

Volunteer hour rules, endless papers, and .

What students said

“Her work load is crazy, it was overwhelming.”
CHLD270
“ . Terrible instructor.”
230

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as hard to pass with limited prep support; assessment overall feels high-stakes and picky.

Hard examsFill-in from textbookLong grading lagPaper-heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person notes easy quizzes mixed with irrelevant fill-ins and .

QuizzesFill-in questionsAttendance-linked credit
“ questions where she selects random sentences from the book that are irrelevant.”
CHLD109

Online

Online students say exams are very hard, prep is weak, and and doubtful of originality.

Hard finalsSlow gradingOriginality scrutiny
“Did not prepare students for and provided essay questions and additional questions to fill in answers.”
230
“TAKES A LONG TIME TO GRADE. AND ALWAYS DOUBTS THE ORIGINALITY OF YOUR WORK”
CHLD230

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Took this teacher last semester for CHLD 270 and dare I say it has been the hardest course I have ever taken in this college.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews across online and and grading harshness. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Experience

30/100

“Terrible instructor. This class was very very stressful.”

⚖️

22/100

“ . but I missed classes and it heavily impacted my grade.”

📚 Workload

18/100

“Her work load is crazy, it was overwhelming.”

🚫 Recommendation

25/100

“ if she was teaching.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • literally reads word for

Theme 2

💼 About Workload

  • 99 volunteer hours but in reality you are doing more than that
  • Tons of upcoming assignments
  • A lot of worth

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Rude in emais and
  • If students express their feelings about her class work, she writes offensive quotes on blackboard

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews with strong recent negatives and some older positives; detail is good but opinions are polarized by era and course.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHLD1094 reviews
CHLD2703 reviews
2302 reviews
CHLD1402 reviews
CHLD1601 review
Show 2 more courses
CHLD2301 review
CHLD2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values