AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Susan Noble

ACT148 · ACCT1481011 · ACCT1481388 · ACCT148 · ACCT1481198 · ACCT1481013 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already know QuickBooks-style work and need almost no instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsive emailsUnclear homeworkPolarizing QuickBooksSelf-grade workAvoid for support
  • Many students report ignored emails and .
  • A vocal minority praises tough, useful QuickBooks skill-building when they already self-drive.
  • in frustrated reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A grades appear only with ; and low grades for format miss make an A costly.

Both formats stress hard work; and silence when stuck.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Accounting software and tax systems feel tough when instruction is incomplete or learned live in class.

Online recent tax class felt especially chaotic; older online QuickBooks fans still called it tough.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

Most reviews leave attendance blank or mark it no for online; .

; online mostly optional or unspecified.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and many explicit avoid warnings outweigh the skill-building praise minority.

Avoid language is strongest in online reviews; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students report lowest grades for and little help recovering.

Format shift

Harsh grading stories appear in both online and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of assignments and expected hard work are consistent even among fans of the class.

Format shift

Online and than light busywork.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

, but repeated non-response, incomplete sessions, and .

Format shift

Online recent review is extremely negative; older online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Homework and software practice drive the class; exams are rarely the focus in comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

clear examples and learning for and .

Main concern

submissions miss her unspoken format.

What students said

“Awesome Teacher! and concise on work. Shows examples for missed answers.”
ACCT148
“ , and is awful at emailing me back.”
ACT148
“ , but . Then when students don't submit the assignment how she wants, she gives the lowest possible grade.”
ACCT148

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections dominate and swing hard between life-changing QuickBooks skill praise and .

Main concern

Email silence, incomplete sessions, and .

What students said

“ . . When she does respond, the answer is either not helpful or incomplete.”
ACCT148
“She never responded to me when I asked her a question and she made us grade all of our own work.”
ACCT148
“I learned SO MUCH! Thank you Professor Susan.”
ACCT148

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe formal exams and .

Assignment-driven gradingUnclear homework specs

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exam logistics.

Homework clarity issues
“ , but . Then when students don't submit the assignment how she wants, she gives the lowest possible grade.”
ACCT148

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or .

Assignment-heavySelf-graded work
“she made us grade all of our own work”
ACCT148

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . When she does respond, the answer is either not helpful or incomplete.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews with strong online weight, highlighting support gaps and polarized QuickBooks outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

📧 Support Responsiveness

20/100

“She never responded to me when I asked her a question and she made us grade all of our own work.”

🛠️ Skill-Building Praise

70/100

“I learned real useful accounting skills as the teacher is right on top of her profession.”

👎 Overall Recommendation

18/100

“I would never recommend her and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Taught a tax system she never used - learned during class- couldn't answer questions
  • Tough, lots of
  • I have learned more from Google than this instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of hard work is expected from the students
  • she gives the lowest possible grade
  • She made us work for our grade.

Theme 3

✉️ About Communication

  • awful at emailing me back
  • Although one she did by just copying her instructions that I already read and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across years with rich detail and repeated themes of support failure versus skill gain support high credibility despite polarization.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ACCT1488 reviews
ACT1482 reviews
ACCT14810111 review
ACCT14810131 review
ACCT14811981 review
Show 1 more courses
ACCT14813881 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1