AI Rate Professor

English

Jane Mushinsky

ENGL201H · 201HONORS · LIT260 · LIT260261 · ENGL201 · ENG201 · ENGL201HONORS · LIT265H · 201H · LIT261 · ENG260 · LIT265 · ENG100 · 123 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
62.86%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if you want real writing growth and ; skip if you need an easy A or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderGives great feedbackGet ready to readCaring but unclear promptsEssay-heavy
  • Caring and funny in person with .
  • ; many call her a .
  • and annotating with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many students earn As only after serious essay effort, office hours, and surviving a .

Both online and ; online adds uneven response times.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college lit and writing with , but pace and analysis demand real work.

In-person reviews dominate; online notes lots of Perusall annotating and three main essays.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

as ; others mark it mandatory or participation-heavy.

Evidence is mostly in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and growth, but a loud minority warns about unclear grading and boring lectures.

In-person fans are stronger; the most negative recent online review is harshly against retaking.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags dominate; 90s and rubrics feel opaque.

Format shift

Strict tone appears in both formats, with online students also citing denied .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Few graded items but , and sometimes timed in-class writes.

Format shift

Online emphasizes Perusall plus three essays; .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students repeatedly call her caring, funny, and , though organization and prompt clarity divide reviews.

Format shift

and care is stronger than mixed online support reports.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and timed writes more than traditional multi-exam batteries.

Format shift

Same essay focus online and in person; lit sections use closed-book in-class assays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Polarized but many students love her humor, care, and discussion-based lit classes; and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Prof. Mushinsky is the . She is a tough grader but .”
201HONORS
“ .”
ENG201
“There were only 5 graded assignments (in class essays at the )”
LIT260

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some and feeling ignored versus in-person students.

Main concern

Uneven support and directions.

What students said

“I was shaking help and her excuse was that she was teaching her in person students”
ENG201
“Mushinsky is always ready to give you paragraphs of and guiding questions if ”
ENGL201H

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and timed closed-book writes rather than proctored multi-choice finals.

Timed in-class essaysClosed-book assaysFew high-stakes papersPerusall annotations

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

British lit and similar courses often grade a handful of closed-book timed in-class essays with heavy discussion prep.

Closed-book in-class essaysTimed assaysEssay drafts with feedback
“There were only 5 graded assignments (in class essays at the )”
LIT260
“ essay (referred to as an assay), usually about five.”
LIT261

Online

Online reviews stress essays and Perusall work with Zoom check-ins before papers; proctoring is not clearly described.

Major essaysPerusall annotatingZoom meetings before essays
“There are 3 main essays and a zoom meeting before each of them.”
ENG201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Mushinsky is the . She is a tough grader but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and reading load. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Really wonderful teacher, lectures are interesting and interactive, extremely relatable.”

📝

28/100

“ .”

❤️ Care and Feedback

78/100

“ , and she will talk to you before and after class about any personal problems you have.”

👍 Recommendation Split

64/100

“If you want to challenge yourself and learn a !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and cares a lot about how students are doing.
  • Shes funny and the texts she assigns are really interesting for the college crowd.
  • She has a very dry sense of humor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This is not an easy A by any means.
  • She is a but .
  • On the was a 93.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • 1-2 reading assignments a week on Perusall that require heavy annotating
  • 3 essays in total, 1 group project, and just annotating stories and poems.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

123

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning many years with consistent , and reading load.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 559
4 out of 517
3 out of 513
2 out of 516
1 out of 518

Course coverage

ENG20122 reviews
201HONORS4 reviews
LIT2614 reviews
ENG1003 reviews
ENGL2013 reviews
Show 9 more courses
LIT2603 reviews
ENGL201H2 reviews
LIT2602612 reviews
LIT265H2 reviews
2012602611 review
201H1 review
ENG2601 review
ENGL201HONORS1 review
LIT2651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 2 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1